Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 25;8(39):65900–65916. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19539

Table 4. Combination indices describing the nature of the interaction between gemcitabine, DSF:Cu and ionising radiation.

SK-N-BE(2c)
Affected fraction Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3
0.25 2.67 2.49 2.54
0.5 1.37 1.33 1.31
0.75 0.82 0.81 0.81
0.95 0.42 0.42 0.46
UVW
Affected fraction Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3
0.25 0.96 1.81 2.25
0.5 0.82 1.10 3.36
0.75 0.73 0.79 5.21
0.95 0.65 0.62 11.7
SH-SY5Y
Affected fraction Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3
0.25 2.87 4.65 3.08
0.5 1.55 2.91 2.63
0.75 1.11 2.17 2.86
0.95 0.91 1.96 4.71
T98G
Affected fraction Schedule 1 Schedule 2 Schedule 3
0.25 3.55 5.53 3.21
0.5 1.69 2.13 2.80
0.75 1.13 1.36 3.96
0.95 0.92 1.04 11.3

The clonogenic assay was used to construct radiation survival curves. SK-N-BE(2c): ionising radiation, 1-2-3 Gy, 0.15 μM DSF:Cu, 450 nM gemcitabine; UVW: ionising radiation, 1-2-3 Gy, 0.1 μM DSF:Cu, 20 nM gemcitabine; SH-SY5Y: ionising radiation, 0.5-1-1.5 Gy, 0.05 μM DSF:Cu, 40 nM gemcitabine; T98G: ionising radiation, 1-2-3 Gy, 1 μM DSF:Cu, 50 nM gemcitabine. Combination index analysis was carried out to evaluate the nature of the interaction between ionising radiation, DSF:Cu and gemcitabine following administration schedules 1, 2 and 3.