Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 11;8(39):66458–66466. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20185

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included for meta-analysis of OS including patient population, treatment arms, and effect estimates (HRs along with 95% confidence intervals and sample sizes for comparator groups) for subgroups defined by all-RAS, KRAS, or BRAF mutation status.

Trial Treatments (N) All–RAS WT Any RAS MT KRAS WT KRAS MT BRAFc WT BRAFc MT
CRYSTAL [6, 18] FOLFIRI + cetuximab (599) 0.69 (0.54–0.88)
178:189
1.05 (0.86–1.28)
246:214
0.80 (0.67–0.95)
316:350
1.03 (0.83–1.28)
214:183
0.70 (0.54–0.91)
156:159
FOLFIRIa (599)
OPUS [19, 20] FOLFOX + cetuximab (169) 0.94 (0.56–1.56)
38:49
1.29 (0.91–1.84)
92:75
0.85 (0.60–1.22)
82:97
1.29 (0.87–1.91)
77:59
0.95 (0.55–1.64)
34:45
FOLFOXa (168)
FIRE-3 [21, 22] FOLFIRI + cetuximab (297) 0.70 (0.54–0.90)
199:201
0.77 (0.62–0.96)
297:295
FOLFIRI + bevacizumaba (295)
PEAK [23] FOLFOX + panitumumab (142) 0.63 (0.39–1.02)
88:82
0.62 (0.44–0.89)
142:143
FOLFOX + bevacizumaba (143)
PRIME [8, 24] FOLFOX + panitumumab (546) 0.78 (0.62–0.99)
259:253
1.25 (1.02–1.55)
272:276
0.88 (0.73–1.06)
325:331
1.17 (0.95–1.45)
221:219
0.74 (0.57–0.96)
228:218
0.90 (0.46–1.76)
24:29
FOLFOXa (550)
CECOG/ CORE1.2.001 [25] FOLFOX + cetuximab (77) 0.48d (0.26–0.90)
34:23
FOLFIRI + cetuximab (74) 0.74d (0.39–1.40)
28:32
AIO KRK 0306 [26] FOLFIRI + cetuximab (50) 0.86 (0.55–1.35) 50:46
FOLFIRI + bevacizumaba (46)
CALGB-SWOG 80405 [15] Chemotherapyb + cetuximab (578) 0.88e (0.72–1.08)
270:256
0.88f (0.77–1.01)
578:559
Chemotherapyb + bevacizumaba (559)
TAILOR [27] FOLFOX + cetuximab (193) 0.76 (0.61–0.96)
193:200
FOLFOXa (200)

aReference arm; bFOLFOX or FOLFIRI; cBRAF evaluated within RAS WT subgroup; dThe reported HR is for WT compared to MT for each arm; eFor FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, the respective HRs are 0.86 (95% CI 0.6–1.1) 198:192 and 1.1 (95% CI 0.7–1.6) 72:64; fFor FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, the respective HRs are 0.83 (95% CI 0.71–0.98) 426:409 and 1.04 (95% CI 0.79–1.35) 152:150.