Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep 9;17(11):1558–1568. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30366-7

Table 1.

Response to treatment

All randomized patients Patients with BRAF wild-type tumours Patients with BRAF mutation-positive tumours
Nivolumab and ipilimumab
(N=95)
Ipilimumab
(N=47)
Nivolumab and ipilimumab
(N=72)
Ipilimumab
(N=37)
Nivolumab and ipilimumab
(N=23)
Ipilimumab
(N=10)
Objective response* 56 (59% [48–69]) 5 (11% [3–23]) 44 (61% [49–72]) 4 (11% [3–25]) 12 (52% [31–73]) 1 (10% [0.3–45])
 Odds ratio for comparison 12.2 (4.4–33.7, p<0.0001) 13.0 (3.9–54.5, p<0.0001) 9.8 (1.0–465.4)
Best overall response*
 Complete response 21 (22.1) 0 16 (22.2) 0 5 (21.7) 0
 Partial response 35 (36.8) 5 (10.6) 28 (38.9) 4 (10.8) 7 (30.4) 1 (10.0)
 Stable disease 12 (12.6) 14 (29.8) 9 (12.5) 13 (35.1) 3 (13.0) 1 (10.0)
 Progressive disease 15 (15.8) 22 (46.8) 10 (13.9) 15 (40.5) 5 (21.7) 7 (70.0)
 Unable to determine 12 (12.6) 6 (12.8) 9 (12.5) 5 (13.5) 3 (13.0) 1 (10.0)
Duration of response
 Ongoing responders n/N (%) 45/56 (80%) 4/5 (80%) 35/44 (80%) 3/4 (75%) 10/12 (83%) 1/1 (100%)
 Median (95% CI, months) NR NR (6.9–NR) NR (NR–NR) NR (6.9–NR) NR (6.1–NR) NR
*

Based on original database lock. Data are n (% [95% CI]) or n (%). Percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

NR=not reached.