Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 19;6(10):1–18. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix080

Table 3:

Pilot study: average number of Illumina MiSeq reads, the average number of (pseudo-)reads that passed QC, and the percentage of QC (pseudo-)reads that were assigned to DNA barcodes and OTUs generated per sample.

Experimental Number of raw Percentage of QC Percentage DNA barcode Percentage OTU clustered
mixture reads (pseudo-)readsa assigned (pseudo-)readsa (pseudo-)readsa
EM1 466 108 88.07 95.68 83.86
EM2 448 428 86.04 97.24 84.04
EM3 496 328 87.46 96.61 84.34
EM4 273 104 77.38 95.74 80.54
EM5 582 254 96.26 97.84 90.63
EM6 442 574 92.81 97.54 81.48
EM7 394 354 93.04 97.14 80.70
EM8 455 172 79.62 95.66 82.35
EM9 434 326 86.23 97.30 83.60
EM10 387 816 87.73 97.00 75.11
EM10R 723 130 95.59 98.02 87.39
EM11 363 374 84.44 96.74 78.63
EM11R 635 304 91.11 98.21 87.01
EM12 355 634 92.55 97.54 76.54
EM13 405 742 89.46 96.49 77.31
EM14 480 772 85.74 95.98 81.91
EM15 554 602 87.05 88.78 82.98
Averageb 464 648 88.27 96.44 82.26

a(Pseudo-)reads are the combined QC pseudo-reads and the QC processed unmerged forward and reverse reads.

bAveraged across the 17 Illumina MiSeq datasets.