Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;7(19):7975–7986. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3350

Table 2.

Results of contrasting sister clades differing in host diversity

Sister pairing HD 1 HD 2 R1 R2 Sign Rel. Log
Somena‐Kidokuga 22 7 6 2 Pos 3.00 0.477
(Arna+Artaxa+Toxoproctis+Euproctis)‐Nygmia 25 15 74 55 Pos 1.35 0.129
Calliteara‐Griveaudyria 28 1 45 2 Pos 22.5 1.352
Laelia‐Pantana 6 1 100 33 Pos 3.03 0.481
Orgyia‐Olene 38 25 62 26 Pos 2.39 0.377
Aroa‐Hemerophanes 5 1 18 6 Pos 3.00 0.477
Lymantria‐(Sarsina+Crorema) 34 4 170 24 Pos 7.08 0.850
Leucoma‐(Ivela+Perina+?Leucoma) 12 7 46 10 Pos 4.60 0.663
(Locharna+Kuromondokuga)‐Pida 8 1 9 13 Neg 0.69 −0.160
Eloria‐Ruanda 5 1 70 3 Pos 23.3 1.368

HD 1 shows the host diversity of the clade with the highest number of host orders in the contrast, with its corresponding species richness (R1), HD 2 shows the host diversity of the clade with lower number of host orders and its corresponding species richness (R2). Relative richness (Rel.) = (R1/R2) and Log = logarithm of relative richness.