Table 2.
Article | Sample | Number of correlations testeda | Number of those correlations that were significant | Average correlationb |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quratulain and Khan (2015) | 217 public servants | 6 | 1 | .07 |
van Loon (2015) | 459 employees in people-changing organizations and 461 employees in people-processing organizations | 8 | 6 | .20 |
French and Emerson (2015) | 272 employees of a local government | 9 | 6 | .22 |
Campbell and Im (2015) | 480 ministry employees | 6 | 5 | .26 |
Ritz, Giauque, Varone, and Anderfuhren-Biget (2014) | 569 public managers at the local level | 3 | 3 | .26 |
Vandenabeele (2014) | 3.506 state civil servants | 4 | 4 | .20 |
Sum | 36 | 25 | .20 |
These are the correlations that were tested between public service motivation and other self-reported measures (excluding demographic characteristics) derived from the same survey.
This is the average correlation (absolute value) in each study of all the identified correlations between public service motivation and other self-reported measures (excluding demographic characteristics) derived from the same survey.