Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 12;6(8):580–588. doi: 10.1530/EC-17-0171

Table 2.

Description of patients at first diagnosis of hyperprolactinaemia and their comparison cohort.

Characteristic Hyperprolactinaemia (n = 1204) Comparison cohort (n = 5888) P
n (%)
Gender- female 943 (78.3) 4602 (78.2) =0.901
SIMD quintile
 1 most deprived 309 (26.4) 1162 (20.5)
 2 230 (19.7) 995 (17.6)
 3 184 (15.7) 926 (16.4)
 4 306 (26.2) 1634 (28.9)
 5 most affluent 141 (12.1) 940 (16.3) <0.001
Diabetes Mellitus 70 (5.8) 204 (3.5) <0.001
Non-fatal Cardiovascular disease 62 (5.2) 183 (3.1) <0.001
Cancer 101 (8.4) 411 (6.9) =0.085
Bone fractures 76 (6.3) 264 (4.5) =0.007
Infectious conditions 198 (16.5) 588 (9.9) <0.001
Renal impairment 79 (6.5) 378 (6.4) =0.855
Medication use
 Bisphosphonate 16 (1.3) 62 (1.1) =0.403
 Prednisolone 93 (7.7) 282 (4.8) <0.001
 HRT 205 (17.0) 1270 (21.6) <0.001
Mean (s.d.)
Age (years)* 39.5 (16.5) 38.7 (15.6) =0.123
Serum prolactin (U/L) 1514 (1177–2382) 193 (143–255) <0.001
Serum TSH (U/L) ϕ 2.2 (1.4–3.9) 2.4 (1.6–3.5) =0.003

(*) Age at study entry (ϕ) Maximum serum concentration: median (interquartile range).

HRT, Oestrogen containing hormone replacement therapy; SIMD, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation; TSH, Thyroid-stimulating hormone.