Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 14;6(10):2179–2187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1118

Table 3.

Comparison of the performance of the 7th, the 8th edition, and the proposed TNM staging system

Concordance indices AIC Likelihood ratio χ 2 Linear trend χ 2
C‐index Bootstrap 95% CI
7th AJCC system 0.624 0.605–0.643 1651.95 6727.243 5917.383
8th AJCC system 0.614 0.596–0.633 1654.69 6725.003 5886.391
Proposed system 0.646 0.628–0.665 1647.30 6732.622 5955.628