Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 3;43(11):1613–1625. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4766-4

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes according to the study period in the intention-to-treat population

Total population
n = 1416
Control period
n = 685
Intervention period
n = 731
P valuea OR (95% CI)b ARR (95% CI)c
Primary outcome
 Microbiologically documented infection
  Total population (n = 1416, 685/731)d 478 (33.8) 193 (28.2) 285 (39.0) <0.001
  Severe sepsis (n = 907, 442/465) 322 (35.5) 124 (28.1) 198 (42.6) <0.001 1.89 (1.43–2.50) 14.5 (8.4–20.7)
  Febrile neutropenia (n = 440, 222/218) 137 (31.1) 67 (30.2) 70 (32.1) 0.66 1.08 (0.71–1.64)
  Suspicion of endocarditis (n = 69, 21/48) 19 (27.5) 2 (9.5) 17 (35.4) 0.04 6.22 (0.98–39.6) 25.9 (7.4–44.4)
Secondary outcomes
 Pathogens identifiede (n = 1416, 685/731)
  Gram-negative bacillif 192 (13.6) 67 (9.8) 125 (17.1) <0.001 1.88 (1.36–2.59) 7.32 (3.8–10.84)
  Gram-positive coccif 288 (20.3) 124 (18.1) 164 (22.4) 0.04 1.32 (1.01–1.72) 4.33 (0.16–8.51)
  Fungi (Candida or Aspergillus)f 21 (1.5) 4 (0.6) 17 (2.3) 0.007 4.12 (1.38–12.36) 1.74 (0.51–2.97)
  Not included in the molecular test (anaerobes or other bacteria)f 28 (2) 10 (1.5) 18 (2.5) 0.18 1.69 (0.77–3.70)
  Time (h) to result validation
  Total population (n = 478, 193/285) 23.6 (14.9–32) 27.5 (20.8–50.9) 22.1 (10.8–27.3) 0.006
  Severe sepsis (n = 322, 124/198) 23.2 (14.2–29.3) 27.4 (19.2–57.0) 21.6 (10.3–26.3) <0.001
  Febrile neutropenia (n = 137, 67/70) 28.5 (19.8–41.8) 31.5 (21–48.3) 26.8 (19.5–36.2) 0.97
 Time (h) to result transmission
 Total population (n = 478, 193/285) 27.5 (17.3–62) 48 (26.3–102) 23.1 (13.2–36.2) <0.001
 Severe sepsis (n = 322, 124/198) 26 (16.9–59.4) 49.5 (23.6–116) 22.9 (12.5–32) <0.001
 Febrile neutropenia (n = 137, 67/70) 38.2 (25.3–67.5) 54.8 (32.1–71.3) 30.8 (21–40.9) 0.15
Appropriate antimicrobial treatment with regard to the bacteremia (n = 1375, 666/709) 395 (28.7) 157 (23.6) 238 (33.6) <0.0001 1.63 (1.29–2.07)

Control period is standard care and intervention period is the period when molecular detection was added to standard care. (/) indicates the number of patients in each group. Variables are expressed as number (%)

OR odds ratios; CI confidence interval; ARR absolute risk reduction

a P value of the χ 2 or the Fisher’s exact test as appropriate, and of linear mixed-effects model for time to result validation and transmission, adjusted for order of intervention (study period first or second)

bORs (95% CI) were estimated using a random-center effect logistic regression adjusted for order of intervention (study period first or second)

cAbsolute risk reduction (ARR) was calculated from percentage values

dOR and ARR were not estimated among the total population because of significant effect modification by type of severe infection (P = 0.03)

eNumber of patients with at least the detailed pathogen isolated from blood

fFor details, see Table 4