Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 5;8:1732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01732

Table 4.

Correlations between identity characteristics, and the experience and management of identity conflict (Study 3).

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
(1) Student flexibility -0.00 0.19 0.21 -0.00 -0.01 0.10 0.19 0.03 0.14 0.16I 0.27∗∗ 0.25∗∗ 0.18 -0.06 0.17 0.07
(2) Employee flexibility 0.21 0.16 0.05 0.05 0.16 0.29∗∗ 0.23 0.14 -0.02 0.06 0.07 -0.02 0.16 -0.03 0.07
(3) Relational flexibility 0.36∗∗∗ 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.07 0.05 -0.12 -0.04 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.01 0.11
(4) Social flexibility -0.11 -0.09 -0.02 -0.10 -0.04 0.12 0.02 0.04 0.15 0.08 0.02 -0.01 -0.03
(5) Role importance 0.36∗∗∗ 0.23∗∗ 0.56∗∗∗ 0.34∗∗∗ 0.18 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.24∗∗ -0.08 0.09
(6) Relational importance -0.22∗∗ 0.20∗∗ 0.76∗∗∗ 0.16 0.11 -0.04 -0.04 -0.03 0.33∗∗∗ -0.12 0.34∗∗∗
(7) Social importance 0.25∗∗ 0.19 0.66∗∗∗ 0.15 0.01 0.18 -0.04 0.22∗∗ 0.03 0.05
(8) Role valence 0.29∗∗∗ 0.18 0.13 0.24∗∗ 0.08 0.10 0.14I 0.11 -0.02
(9) Relational valence 0.26∗∗∗ 0.16 0.01 0.09 -0.01 0.32∗∗∗ -0.20∗∗ 0.24∗∗
(10) Social valence 0.18 -0.02 0.23∗∗ 0.02 0.12 -0.04 -0.01
(11) Magnitude 0.35∗∗∗ 0.23∗∗ 0.31∗∗∗ 0.22∗∗ -0.06 0.13
(12) Stress 0.37∗∗∗ 0.33∗∗∗ 0.02 0.16 -0.03
(13) Growth 0.08 0.08 -0.01 -0.13
(14) Retreat -0.02 0.10 0.25∗∗∗
(15) Reconciliation -0.40∗∗∗ 0.27∗∗∗
(16) Realignment -0.10
(17) Reflection

Controlling for conflict occurrence, conflict choice, and gender. Ip < 0.07, p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Controlling for conflict occurrence, conflict choice, and gender.