Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;6(9):e005983. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005983

Table 4.

Subgroup Analyses of the Studies on Processed Meat Consumption and Stroke Incidence

Processed Meat Stroke Incidence
No. RR (95% CI) I 2, % P h Value
Stroke subtype
Ischemic 5 1.10 (0.96–1.27) 11.4 0.341
Hemorrhagic 5 1.19 (0.95–1.49) 8.10 0.360
Sex
Male 4 1.21 (1.09–1.34) 0.00 0.480
Female 4 1.12 (1.01–1.24) 0.00 0.476
No. of cases
<2000 4 1.22 (1.09–1.37) 0.00 0.943
≥2000 4 1.10 (0.96–1.26) 39.3 0.176
Follow‐up duration
<20 y 4 1.12 (0.95–1.31) 36.6 0.193
≥20 y 4 1.17 (1.05–1.30) 0.00 0.674
Adjustment variable
Education
Yes 6 1.16 (1.04–1.29) 0.60 0.412
No 2 1.16 (1.01–1.33) 20.8 0.261
Family history of MI
Yes 4 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 0.00 0.595
No 4 1.05 (0.85–1.28) 6.00 0.363
Fruit and vegetable intake
Yes 6 1.15 (1.05–1.26) 16.6 0.307
No 2 1.24 (0.94–1.63) 0.00 0.799
Fish intake
Yes 4 1.12 (0.95–1.31) 36.6 0.193
No 4 1.17 (1.05–1.30) 0.00 0.674
Use of aspirin
Yes 4 1.18 (1.08–1.29) 0.00 0.595
No 4 1.05 (0.85–1.28) 6.00 0.363
Use of vitamin supplements
Yes 4 1.09 (0.94–1.27) 34.0 0.208
No 4 1.22 (1.09–1.37) 0.00 0.943

CI indicates confidence interval; MI, myocardial infarction; P h indicates P value for heterogeneity; RR, relative risk.