Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 15;33(5):369–409. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001

Table 7.

Selected clinical trials of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and/or for FDA approval

Trial Year Type N AF type Ablation strategy Initial time frame Effectiveness endpoint Ablation success Drug/ Control success P value for success Ablation complications Drug/Control complications Comments
Clinical Trials Performed for FDA Approval
 JAMA 2010; 303: 333-340 (ThermoCoolAF)14 2010 Randomized to RF ablation or AAD, multicenter 167 Paroxysmal PVI, optional CFAEs and lines 12 months Freedom from symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, acute procedural failure, or changes in specified drug regimen 66% 16% <0.001 4.9% 8.8% FDA approval received
 JACC 2013; 61: 1713-1723 (STOP AF)9 2013 Randomized to cryoballoon ablation or AAD, multicenter 245 Paroxysmal PVI 12 months Freedom from any detectable AF, use of nonstudy AAD, or nonprotocol intervention for AF 70% 7% <0.001 3.1% NA FDA approval received
 Heart Rhythm 2014; 11: 202-209 (TTOP)22 2014 Randomized to phased RF ablation or AAD/cardioversion, multicenter 210 Persistent PVI + CFAEs 6 months Acute procedural success, ≥90% reduction in AF burden, off AAD 56% 26% <0.001 12.3% NA Not FDA approved
 JACC 2014; 64: 647-656 (SMART-AF)13 2014 Nonrandomzied multicenter study of contact force-sensing RF catheter, comparing to performance goals 172 Paroxysmal PVI, optional CFAEs and lines 12 months Freedom from symptomatic AF, flutter, tachycardia, acute procedural failure, or changes in AAD 72.5% N/A <0.0001 7.5% NA FDA approval received
 Circulation 2015; 132: 907-915 (TOCCASTAR)12 2015 Randomized to contact force sensing RF catheter or approved RF catheter, multicenter 300 Paroxysaml PVI, optional triggers, CAFEs and lines in both arms 12 months Acute procedural success + Freedom from Symptomatic AF/Flutter/Tachycardia off AAD 67.8% 69.4% 0.0073 for noninferiority 7.2% 9.1% FDA approval received
 JACC 2015; 66: 1350-1360 (HeartLight)11 2015 Randomized to laserballoon or approved RF catheter, multicenter 353 Paroxysmal PVI ± CTI ablation vs PVI, optional CFAEs, and Lines 12 months Freedom from Symptomatic AF/Flutter/Tachycardia, acute procedural failure, AAD, or non-prototocol intervention 61.1% 61.7% 0.003 for noninferiority 5.3% 6.4% FDA approval received
First-Line Therapy Trials
 JAMA 2005; 293: 2634-2640 (RAAFT)29 2005 Randomized to drug, multicenter 70 Paroxysmal (N=67), persistent (N= 3) PVI 12 months Freedom from detectable AF 84% 37% <0.01 9% 11%
 NEJM 2012; 367:1587-1595 (MANTRA-PAF)30 2012 Randomized to drug, multicenter 294 Paroxysmal AF PVI, roof line, optional mitral and tricuspid line 24 months Cumulative AF burden 13% AF burden 19% AF burden NS 17% 15%
 JAMA 2014; 311: 692-700 (RAAFT-2)31 2014 Randomized to drug multicenter 127 Paroxysmal AF PVI plus optional non-PVI targets 24 months Freedom from detectable AF, flutter, tachycardia 45% 28% 0.02 9% 4.9%
Other Paroxysmal AF Ablation Trials
 JACC 2006; 48: 2340-2347 (APAF)16 2006 Randomized to drug single center 198 Paroxysmal AF PVI, mitral line and tricuspid line 12 months Freedom from detectable AF, flutter, tachycardia 86% 22% <0.001 1% 23%
 Circulation 2008; 118: 2498-2505 (A4)7 2008 Randomized to drug 112 Paroxysmal PVI (optional LA lines, CTI, focal) 12 months Freedom from AF 89% 23% <0.0001 5.7% 1.7%
 NEJM 2016; 374: 2235-2245 (FIRE AND ICE)10 2016 Randomized RF vs Cryo, multicenter 762 Paroxysmal AF PVI 12 months Freedom from detectable AF, flutter, tachycardia 64.1% (RF) 65.4% (cryo) NS 12.8% 10.2%
 JACC 2016; 68: 2747-275715 2016 Randomized to hot balloon or drug, multicenter 100 Paroxysmal AF PVI 12 months Freedom from AF 59% 5% <0.001 10.4% 4.7%
Other Persistent AF Ablation Trials
 NEJM 2006; 354: 934-94125 2006 Randomized to RF ablation or to CV and short term amio 146 Persistent PVI, roof, mitral line 12 months No AF or flutter month 12 74% 58% 0.05 1.3% 1.4%
 EHJ 2014; 35: 501-507 (SARA)26 2014 Randomized to drug (2:1 ablation to drug), multicenter 146 Persistent PVI (optional LA lines, CFAEs) 12 months Freedom from AF/flutter lasting >24h 70% 44% 0.002 6.1% 4.20%
 NEJM 2015; 372: 1812-182219 2015 Randomized ablation strategies, multicenter 589 Persistent PVI alone versus PVI & CFAEs or PVI & lines 18 months Freedom from afib with or without drugs 59% (PVI alone) 49% & 46% NS 6% 4.3% & 7.6%
Other Mixed Paroxysmal and Persistent AF Ablation Trials
 J Med Assoc Thai 2003; 86 (Suppl 1): S8-S1624 2003 Randomized to RF ablation or amiodarone 30 Paroxysmal (70%), Persistent (30%) PVI, mitral line, CTI, SVC to IVC 12 months Freedom from AF 79% 40% 0.018 6.70% 47%
 EHJ 2006; 27: 216-22117 2006 Randomized to RF ablation or drug, multicenter 137 Paroxysmal (67%), Persistent (33%) PVI, mitral line, CTI 12 months Freedom from AF, flutter, tachycardia 66% 9% <0.001 4.40% 2.90%
 JCVEP 2009, 20: 22-2818 2009 Randomized to RF ablation or drug, multicenter 70 Paroxysmal (41%), Persistent (59%) & type 2 DM PVI, CTI, optional mitral line and roof line 12 months Freedom from AF and atypical atrial flutter 80% 43% 0.001 2.90% 17%
Randomized Trials of AF Ablation in Patients with Heart Failure
 NEJM 2008; 359: 1778-1785 (PABA-HF)38 2008 Randomized to RF ablation of AVJ abl and BiV pacing 81 Persistent (50%), Paroxysmal (50%), EF 27% abl, 29% AVJ PVI, optional linear abl and CFAEs 6 months Composite EF, 6 min walk, MLWHF score; freedom from AF (secondary, mult proc, +/- AA drugs) 88% AF free, EF 35% abl, 28% AVJ (P <.001), > QOL and 6 min walk increase with abl <0.001 14.60% 17.50%
 Heart 2011; 97: 740-74739 2011 Randomized to RF ablation or pharmacological rate control 41 Persistent , EF 20% abl, 16% rate control PVI, roof line, CFAEs 6 months Change in LVEF, sinus rhythm at 6 months (secondary) 50% in NSR, LVEF increase 4.5% 0% in NSR, LVEF increase 2.8% 0.6 (for EF increase) 15% Not reported
 JACC 2013; 61: 1894-190346 2013 Randomized to RF ablation or pharmacological rate control 52 Persistent AF (100%), EF 22% abl, 25% rate control PVI, optional linear abl and CFAEs 12 months Change in peak O2 consumption (also reported single procedure off drug ablation success) Peak O2 consumption increase greater with abl, 72% abl success 0.018 15% Not reported
 Circ A and E 2014; 7:31-3840 2014 Randomized to RF ablation or pharmacological rate control 50 Persistent AF (100%), EF 32% abl, 34% rate control PVI, optional linear abl and CFAEs 6 months Change in LVEF at 6 months, multiple procedure freedom from AF also reported LVEF 40% with abl, 31% rate control, 81% AF free with abl 0.015 7.70%

AF = atrial fibrillation; RF = radiofrequency; AVJ = atrioventricular junction; abl = ablation; BiV = biventricular; EF = ejection fraction; PVI = pulmonary vein isolation; CFAEs = complex fractionated atrial electrograms; MLWHF = Minnesota Living with Heart Failure; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; QOL = quality of life; NSR = normal sinus rhythm.