Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 27;2017:8368513. doi: 10.1155/2017/8368513

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis by excluding the population with eGFR less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Changes in proteinuria P trend Per degree decrease
Elevated proteinuria Stable proteinuria Reduced proteinuria
All participants
 Model 1 1.93 (1.66–2.23) 1 0.76 (0.60–0.97) <0.0001 0.71 (0.67–0.76)
 Model 2 1.68 (1.45–1.95) 1 0.72 (0.57–0.92) <0.0001 0.75 (0.71–0.80)
 Model 3 1.66 (1.43–1.93) 1 0.72 (0.57–0.92) <0.0001 0.75 (0.71–0.80)
 Model 4 1.55 (1.34–1.81) 1 0.71 (0.56–0.90) <0.0001 0.78 (0.73–0.82)
Diabetes
 Model 4 1.76 (1.43–2.15) 1 0.73 (0.54–1.01) <0.0001 0.74 (0.69–0.80)
Prediabetes
 Model 4 1.35 (1.07–1.69) 1 0.71 (0.49–1.02) 0.0005 0.82 (0.75–0.91)

Model 1: adjusted for the levels of baseline proteinuria; model 2: adjusted for age, gender, and baseline proteinuria; model 3: adjusted for age, gender, level of education, income, smoking, alcohol abuse, amount of physical activity, body mass index, and baseline proteinuria; model 4: adjusted for variables in model 3 plus history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, fasting plasma glucose, and creatinine. The P value of interaction between proteinuria changes and diabetes for all-cause mortality is 0.3510.