Table 1.
Cell types | Peak amplitude of AP (mV) | Resting membrane potential (mV) | Input resistance (MΩ) | Series resistance (MΩ) | Number of cells/mice |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
untrans | 106.1 ± 1.331 | −55.87 ± 0.900 | 105.6 ± 8.452 | 8.127 ± 0.2768 | 45/8 |
pSup | 108.5 ± 2.452 | −58.51 ± 1.604 | 122.9 ± 18.62 | 8.869 ± 0.6093 | 13/7 |
shScr | 109.3 ± 1.456 | −57.47 ± 1.104 | 143.1 ± 18.03 | 8.456 ± 0.3902 | 20/5 |
shLuc | 106.0 ± 2.224 | −57.07 ± 1.054 | 131.0 ± 11.29 | 9.349 ± 0.3110 | 22/9 |
Statistics p value | shLuc vs shScr 0.7606 | shLuc vs shScr >0.9999 | shLuc vs shScr 0.9893 | shLuc vs shScr 0.4875 | |
shLuc vs pSup 0.9657 | shLuc vs pSup 0.9777 | shLuc vs pSup 0.9996 | shLuc vs pSup 0.9755 | ||
shLuc vs untrans >0.9999 | shLuc vs untrans 0.9604 | shLuc vs untrans 0.567 | shLuc vs untrans 0.0681 | ||
shScr vs untrans 0.6744 | shScr vs pSup 0.9958 | shScr vs pSup 0.9434 | shScr vs pSup 0.988 | ||
shScr vs pSup >0.9999 | shScr vs untrans 0.8504 | shScr vs untrans 0.1487 | shScr vs untrans 0.9813 | ||
pSup vs untrans 0.9603 | pSup vs untrans 0.5991 | pSup vs untrans 0.9558 | pSup vs untrans 0.7507 |
Note that all of these parameters were not statistically different between four cell groups. Statistics were done by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey.