Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 11;4(5):ENEURO.0186-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0186-17.2017

Table 2.

Statistical table

Graph Data structure Type of test Dataset p value
Fig. 1A Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test AMPAR-EPSC 0.97
NMDAR-EPSC 0.51
AMPAR/NMDAR ratio 0.97
Fig. 1B Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test AMPAR-EPSC 0.69
NMDAR-EPSC 0.47
A/N ratio 0.33
Fig. 1C Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test AMPAR-EPSC 0.79
NMDAR-EPSC 0.79
A/N ratio 0.47
Fig. 1D Parametric Student’s t test PPR of pSup 0.86
PPR of shScr 0.48
PPR of shLuc 0.76
Fig. 2A Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test GABAAR-IPSC 0.21
AMPAR-EPSC 1
AMPAR/GABAAR ratio 0.55
Fig. 2B Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test GABAAR-IPSC 0.43
AMPAR-EPSC 0.41
A/G ratio 0.56
Fig. 2C Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test GABAAR-IPSC 0.69
AMPAR-EPSC 0.92
A/G ratio 0.89
Fig. 2D Nonparametric Mann-Whitney test GABAAR-IPSC 0.15
AMPAR-EPSC 0.24
A/G ratio 0.58
Fig. 2E Parametric Student’s t test PPR of pSup 0.63
PPR of shScr 0.74
PPR of shLuc 0.31
Fig. 3B Parametric One-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey Spine density: pSup vs shLuc 0.45
pSup vs shScr 0.09
shScr vs shLuc 0.65
Spine length: pSup vs shLuc 0.99
pSup vs shScr 0.68
shScr vs shLuc 0.63
Spine width: pSup vs shLuc 0.96
pSup vs shScr 0.37
shScr vs shLuc 0.53
Fig. 4A Parametric Two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey −100 pA
untrans vs shLuc >0.9999
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
−50 pA
untrans vs shLuc >0.9999
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
0 pA
untrans vs shLuc >0.9999
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
50 pA
untrans vs shLuc >0.9999
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup 0.9993
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup 0.9995
shScr vs pSup 0.9996
100 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.9997
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup 0.9923
shLuc vs shScr 0.9995
shLuc vs pSup 0.9978
shScr vs pSup 0.9928
150 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.9909
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup 0.9964
shLuc vs shScr 0.9959
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs pSup 0.9982
200 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.9818
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup 0.8433
shLuc vs shScr 0.9915
shLuc vs pSup 0.9674
shScr vs pSup 0.8983
250 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.7984
untrans vs shScr 0.9421
untrans vs pSup 0.4089
shLuc vs shScr 0.9945
shLuc vs pSup 0.8912
shScr vs pSup 0.8019
300 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.6045
untrans vs shScr 0.8776
untrans vs pSup 0.124
shLuc vs shScr 0.9847
shLuc vs pSup 0.714
shScr vs pSup 0.5448
350 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.2035
untrans vs shScr 0.8942
untrans vs pSup 0.1894
shLuc vs shScr 0.7588
shLuc vs pSup 0.9865
shScr vs pSup 0.6361
400 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.1775
untrans vs shScr 0.7432
untrans vs pSup 0.2523
shLuc vs shScr 0.8662
shLuc vs pSup 0.9987
shScr vs pSup 0.844
450 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0599
untrans vs shScr 0.8942
untrans vs pSup 0.2917
shLuc vs shScr 0.4825
shLuc vs pSup 0.9928
shScr vs pSup 0.7592
500 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0477
untrans vs shScr 0.9921
untrans vs pSup 0.6175
shLuc vs shScr 0.2411
shLuc vs pSup 0.8394
shScr vs pSup 0.8383
550 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0101
untrans vs shScr 0.9971
untrans vs pSup 0.8145
shLuc vs shScr 0.0831
shLuc vs pSup 0.4248
shScr vs pSup 0.9297
600 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0043
untrans vs shScr >0.9999
untrans vs pSup 0.68
shLuc vs shScr 0.0299
shLuc vs pSup 0.437
shScr vs pSup 0.7694
650 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0014
untrans vs shScr 0.995
untrans vs pSup 0.8638
shLuc vs shScr 0.0266
shLuc vs pSup 0.176
shScr vs pSup 0.9617
700 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0003
untrans vs shScr 0.9998
untrans vs pSup 0.9417
shLuc vs shScr 0.0061
shLuc vs pSup 0.0571
shScr vs pSup 0.9735
750 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0002
untrans vs shScr 0.7664
untrans vs pSup 0.9643
shLuc vs shScr 0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.038
shScr vs pSup 0.6549
800 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0007
untrans vs shScr 0.5283
untrans vs pSup 0.9959
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.038
shScr vs pSup 0.6058
850 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0041
untrans vs shScr 0.2197
untrans vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0601
shScr vs pSup 0.4478
900 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0005
untrans vs shScr 0.4401
untrans vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0174
shScr vs pSup 0.6624
950 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0001
untrans vs shScr 0.1954
untrans vs pSup 0.9999
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.006
shScr vs pSup 0.466
1000 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0004
untrans vs shScr 0.1282
untrans vs pSup 0.9992
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0108
shScr vs pSup 0.4014
1050 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0001
untrans vs shScr 0.2644
untrans vs pSup 0.9762
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0025
shScr vs pSup 0.728
1100 pA
untrans vs shLuc 0.0003
untrans vs shScr 0.2803
untrans vs pSup 0.999
shLuc vs shScr <0.0001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0087
shScr vs pSup 0.5944
Fig. 4B Parametric One-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey Threshhold:
shLuc vs shScr 0.0249
shLuc vs pSup 0.0421
shLuc vs untrans 0.0094
shScr vs pSup 0.9958
shScr vs untrans 0.9991
pSup vs untrans 0.9837
Half width:
shLuc vs shScr 0.0002
shLuc vs pSup 0.0165
shLuc vs untrans <0.0001
shScr vs pSup 0.9231
shScr vs untrans 0.9846
pSup vs untrans 0.7637
Fig. 4C Parametric Two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey -80 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs untrans >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans >0.9999
-70 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup 0.9998
shLuc vs untrans >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans >0.9999
-60 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup 0.9982
shLuc vs untrans 0.9994
shScr vs pSup 0.9995
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.9999
−50 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.9996
shLuc vs pSup 0.9956
shLuc vs untrans 0.998
shScr vs pSup 0.9992
shScr vs untrans 0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.9999
−40 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.999
shLuc vs pSup 0.2815
shLuc vs untrans 0.9959
shScr vs pSup 0.3548
shScr vs untrans 0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.3237
−30 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0008
shLuc vs pSup 0.0272
shLuc vs untrans 0.0755
shScr vs pSup 0.7329
shScr vs untrans 0.315
pSup vs untrans 0.9295
−20 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0007
shLuc vs pSup 0.0009
shLuc vs untrans 0.0235
shScr vs pSup 0.9999
shScr vs untrans 0.5293
pSup vs untrans 0.5778
−10 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0007
shLuc vs pSup 0.0013
shLuc vs untrans 0.0183
shScr vs pSup 0.9983
shScr vs untrans 0.5872
pSup vs untrans 0.7019
0 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0014
shLuc vs untrans 0.015
shScr vs pSup 0.9998
shScr vs untrans 0.7013
pSup vs untrans 0.7536
10 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0005
shLuc vs pSup 0.0008
shLuc vs untrans 0.0083
shScr vs pSup 0.9996
shScr vs untrans 0.6986
pSup vs untrans 0.7654
20 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0011
shLuc vs pSup 0.0017
shLuc vs untrans 0.0064
shScr vs pSup 0.9994
shScr vs untrans 0.856
pSup vs untrans 0.9091
30 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0015
shLuc vs pSup 0.0017
shLuc vs untrans 0.0042
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans 0.9547
pSup vs untrans 0.9613
Fig. 4D Parametric Two-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey −80 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup >0.9999
shLuc vs untrans >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans >0.9999
−70 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup 0.9998
shLuc vs untrans >0.9999
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans >0.9999
−60 mV
shLuc vs shScr >0.9999
shLuc vs pSup 0.9982
shLuc vs untrans 0.9994
shScr vs pSup 0.9995
shScr vs untrans >0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.9999
−50 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.9996
shLuc vs pSup 0.9956
shLuc vs untrans 0.998
shScr vs pSup 0.9992
shScr vs untrans 0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.9999
−40 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.999
shLuc vs pSup 0.2815
shLuc vs untrans 0.9959
shScr vs pSup 0.3548
shScr vs untrans 0.9999
pSup vs untrans 0.3237
−30 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0008
shLuc vs pSup 0.0272
shLuc vs untrans 0.0755
shScr vs pSup 0.7329
shScr vs untrans 0.315
pSup vs untrans 0.9295
−20 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0007
shLuc vs pSup 0.0009
shLuc vs untrans 0.0235
shScr vs pSup 0.9999
shScr vs untrans 0.5293
pSup vs untrans 0.5778
−10 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0007
shLuc vs pSup 0.0013
shLuc vs untrans 0.0183
shScr vs pSup 0.9983
shScr vs untrans 0.5872
pSup vs untrans 0.7019
0 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.001
shLuc vs pSup 0.0014
shLuc vs untrans 0.015
shScr vs pSup 0.9998
shScr vs untrans 0.7013
pSup vs untrans 0.7536
10 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0005
shLuc vs pSup 0.0008
shLuc vs untrans 0.0083
shScr vs pSup 0.9996
shScr vs untrans 0.6986
pSup vs untrans 0.7654
20 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0011
shLuc vs pSup 0.0017
shLuc vs untrans 0.0064
shScr vs pSup 0.9994
shScr vs untrans 0.856
pSup vs untrans 0.9091
30 mV
shLuc vs shScr 0.0015
shLuc vs pSup 0.0017
shLuc vs untrans 0.0042
shScr vs pSup >0.9999
shScr vs untrans 0.9547
pSup vs untrans 0.9613
Fig. 5A Parametric Student’s t test Ctrl vs CPT <0.00001
Fig. 5B Parametric One-way ANOVA post hoc Tukey shLuc vs shScr 0.8937
shLuc vs pSup 0.885
shScr vs pSup 0.9996