Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Aug 12;58(4):809–815. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1213824

Table III.

Hazard ratios for survival via PET and CT response.

Comparison Evaluable patients, unadjusted Evaluable patients, FLIPI-adjusted Propensity score-matched patients

OS
HR (95% CI)
PFS
HR (95% CI)
OS
HR (95% CI)
PFS
HR (95% CI)
OS
HR (95% CI)
PFS
HR (95% CI)
CT-negative Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
CT-positive 1.61 (1.13, 2.29) 1.45 (1.12, 1.89) 1.38 (0.96, 1.97) 1.34 (1.03, 1.75) 1.76 (1.15, 2.69) 1.32 (0.96, 1.82)
PET-negative Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref Ref
PET-positive 1.78 (1.16, 2.72) 1.63 (1.21, 2.20) 1.54 (1.01, 2.36) 1.54 (1.14, 2.07) 1.94 (1.22, 3.08) 1.48 (1.06, 2.07)
CT-negative Ref Ref
PET-negative 0.80 (0.49, 1.31) 0.99 (0.71, 1.38)
CT-positive Ref Ref
PET-positive 0.88 (0.58, 1.35) 1.10 (0.78, 1.55)

CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; FLIPI, Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PET, positron emission tomography; PFS, progression-free survival; Ref, reference