Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;114(40):E8324–E8332. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704489114

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Predictions for LCAMP behavior within membranes based on the lipid–peptide topological interactions and their effects on the terms of Eq. 1 (γ, pore rim line tension; σG, membrane tension; and EL, lipid–peptide interaction energy). The lipid topology of the membrane systems is indicated by block shapes, with lipids having a clustering mechanism given as a red outline. Within A, m2a generates high γ values (red) but low σG and EL (green) through clustering with conical lipids along its helical face. Pore mechanism is suppressed via inefficient leaflet fold packing, while carpet mechanism is suppressed by nullification of the peptides’ positive curvature. m2a will, therefore, react via bursting. Melittin clusters the conical lipids at its C terminus and associates with the inverse conical lipids along its helical face. This generates low γ combined with high EL at the C terminus and will respond via both pore (low γ) and carpet mechanisms (high EL). (B) In this membrane, m2a clusters inverse conical lipids at its helical face, generating low γ and high EL, which together with the presence of conical nonbilayer lipids allows the peptide to produce all three PIEs. Melittin generates higher γ and lower EL and primarily reacts via bursting. (C) m2a produces low γ and high EL through clustering with inverse conical lipids along its helical face. This will generate pore and carpet mechanisms. Melittin generates low γ and EL and will be forced to react mainly via bursting.