Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2015 Nov 25;88(6):1297–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.040

Figure 4. Direct Comparison of Task 1 and Task 2 Processing Dynamics during Dual-Task Interference.

Figure 4

(A–D) Task collision in Lag 9 to 1. In each panel, the surface is delimited by the measured onset and offset of the prediction performance of each classifier (blue: Task 1, red: Task 2). Colored dots indicate significant differences between the Lag 9 condition (peak latency, onset, and offset) and the condition of interest (signed rank tests, FDR corrected). T1 is presented at time 0 and the corresponding diagonal is represented by a dashed line. Small black segments on this diagonal indicate T1 onset on x and y axes. Task 2 is represented similarly except that T2 onset varies in each panel. On the right of each panel are represented the time courses of classifiers (blue, Task 1; red, Task 2) trained at 300, 400, and 500 ms. The thick lines represent an AUC significantly different from chance level (FDR corrected). The gray dotted lines indicate the training time of each classifier.