Skip to main content
African Health Sciences logoLink to African Health Sciences
. 2017 Mar;17(1):24–31. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v17i1.5

Geophagy as risk behaviour for gastrointestinal nematode infections among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in a humid tropical zone of Nigeria

Njoku Ivoke 1, Nnenna Ikpor 1, Obinna Ivoke 2, Felicia Ekeh 1, Ngozi Ezenwaji 1, Gregory Odo 1, Florence Iyaji 3, Uwakwe Onoja 4, Joseph Eyo 1
PMCID: PMC5636248  PMID: 29026374

Abstract

Background

Geophagy is wide spread among pregnant women in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess intestinal nematode infections among geophagous pregnant women in Southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Methods

Pregnant women were aged 17–45 years at gestational ages of ≥ 14 to 24 weeks on hospital enrolment were sampled. Data on geophagy was collected using structured questionnaire. Gastrointestinal nematode status of the participants was determined by stool analyses. Soil types ingested were examined for intestinal nematode ova / larvae.

Results

The prevalence of geophagy (46.4%) was associated with socio-demographic characteristics. Ascaris lumbricoides and hookworm were associated with geophagy while Trichuris trichiura and Strongyloides stercoralis had no association. Prevalence of A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and S. stercoralis differed significantly (p<0.05) between geophagous and non-geophagous women. The soil types consumed had eggs / larvae of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura. Geophagy is a risk behaviour directly associated with A. lumbricoides, hookworm, T. trichiura, and to a lesser extent S. stercoralis infection among pregnant women.

Conclusion

Sensitization and mass education of pregnant women on the dangers of geophagy is needed. Furthermore, deworming of pregnant women should be integrated into the healthcare delivery system of the State.

Keywords: Geophagy, gastrointestinal nematode, pregnant women, humid tropics

Background

Geophagy is the purposive ingestion of earth excavated from known and usually uncontaminated sources, and not the consumption of surface soils from residential areas1. This behaviour is common among many traditional human societies2,3,4 and is widespread among women in sub-Saharan tropical communities5,6,7,8. Although geophagy is usually regarded as a response to physiologic demand during pregnancy, the behaviour is culturally and widely accepted especially among pregnant women globally2,9. In many tropical sub-Saharan countries where this behaviour is regarded as a response to obligatory physiologic demand, the prevalence among pregnant women has ranged from 28, 42, 46 and 65% in Tanzania, Namibia, Ghana and Kenya, respectively5,6,10,11,12,13. The health benefits derived from geophagic behaviour continue to be subjects of debate. In the low-income groups, geophagy has been reported to be prevalent among women and children to relieve the pangs of hunger2. Wiley and Katz have suggested that the consumption of clay soil serves different functions including relief of gastrointestinal distress at different stages of pregnancy, as well as supplementing nutrients (especially iron and calcium in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy14. Nausea and vomiting experienced by pregnant women are reported to have been reduced on ingestion of clay soil3. A range of harmful effects, including geohelminth infection, constipation, intestinal blockage and anaemia have been postulated by researchers15,16.

Geophagous behaviour has long been a suspected source of soil-transmitted helminth infections2,3,17. The effect of geophagy on pregnant women as a consequence of intestinal nematode infection has not been extensively studied although available information suggests that it is especially common among this category of women7,13. A pilot survey conducted in association with Local Government Health Committee had shown that geophagy was widely practiced in Ebonyi State, Nigeria by pregnant women.

General objective: Given the role that soil-transmitted intestinal nematode infections play in exacerbating malnutrition, and the importance of maternal nutrition during pregnancy (especially among pregnant women in rural areas), our research group assessed the relationship between geophagy as a risk factor for the transmission of the orally ingested nematode parasites among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in a referral hospital of Southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria.

Specific objectives: The specific objectives were to (i) identify the soil types commonly eaten by pregnant women, (ii) associate geophagous pregnant women with gastrointestinal nematode infections and (iii) establish the presence or absence of gastrointestinal nematode eggs/larvae in the soil types.

Materials and methods

Study area

Ebonyi State, one of the thirty six States of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, lies between the coordinates 50401, 60551N and 70301, 80301E. The study Local Government Area (LGA), (Afikpo North), is located between latitudes 50471, 50561 N and longitude 70501, 70551 E. The population of 156,649 lives in a land area of 430 km2 with 1:1.2 ratio of male to female18. About 52% of the women are of childbearing age (17 – 49) years. Topographically, the land is composed of sharp escarpments in the trough of sharply undulating sandstone ridge in an elevation of 250 – 350 metres above sea level19.

The soil is dominantly loamy to dark brown clay. The climate is typically tropical with a longer humid rainy season (April – November) and a shorter dry season (November – March). The annual precipitation is between 200 mm and 220 mm with mean relative humidity (RH) of 78 ± 71%. The humid climatic environment and the indiscriminate defecation in farms by children and young adults create conditions favourable for the development and transmission of the infective stages of soil-transmitted nematodes. The study area has 6 governments grant-aided and 10 private health facilities including the major antenatal clinic located at Mater Misericordiae hospital in Afikpo. The dominant occupations of the inhabitants are farming and shrimp fishing. Agriculture is carried out in small farm holdings dotted with termite mounds, and rice is cultivated in paddy fields. Reports of a pilot survey conducted in public and private health institutions in parts of Southern Ebonyi state indicated that geophagy and intestinal nematode infections were prevalent among pregnant women, hence Afikpo was ideal for the study of the relationship between geophagy and intestinal nematode burden.

Ethical consideration

All the study protocols were approved by the Research and Publications Committee of the Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Nigeria, Enugu State; Afikpo North Local Government Committee of Health, and the administrator, Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Afikpo, Ebonyi State.

Study design and population

Prior to the commencement of the study, advocacy visits were made to the LGA chairperson, the coordinator of the development centre and the administrator of the hospital to explain the objectives, expected benefits, potential risks, and to solicit for co-operation of the populace. The hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2012 and July 2012 at Mater Misericordiae hospital Afikpo, Southern Ebonyi State. The hospital serves as a referral centre for the component communities in the LGA. From a sample frame of 1,047 pregnant women in various stages of pregnancy who were attending antenatal clinics, a total of 797 participants (approximately 114 per month) were selected using a table of random numbers. The aims and methods of the study were explained to the women who gave verbal consent before the investigations began. Eligibility criteria were: residence in the study area for ≥ 10 years, gestational age ≥ 14 weeks and 24 weeks on enrolment, and ability to give sourced information. Exclusion criteria included presence of underlying severe morbidities (for example severe diarrhoea, and/or malaria). Geophagous participants were examined for geohelminth infection at baseline and re-examined 2 and 10 weeks after treatment with albendazole. Using a close-ended structured questionnaire, trained female research assistants (midwives) interviewed the participating women in the native language, Igbo, and also obtained data on socio-demographic, obstetrics and geophagous practice (defined as deliberate eating of earth (soil). Geophagous participants in addition provided samples of the soil type they consumed for analysis.

Parasitological examination

A single freshly-passed stool sample was collected from each pregnant subject at baseline for analysis. Coded number was used to ensure anonymity of the donors and to facilitate the laboratory procedure. The coded number also tallied with the number on the questionnaire of each subject. Stool specimens were examined within an hour for hookworm eggs and on the following day for recovery and identification of other intestinal nematode eggs/larvae using the formalin-ethyl acetate concentration technique20.

Types of earth consumed

The four types of earth usually ingested by pregnant women in the study area were nzu, ukwaka, eja akika and eja uno; Nzu is the moulded clay earth harvested by digging about 2 metres below the soil in a particular site. Ukwaka, like nzu is obtained from a specific area of the soil where it is found in layers. Unlike nzu, ukwaka is consumed without further treatment. Eja may be obtained from two main sources: eja akika - termite mounds or eja uno - mud blocks from earth walls of houses. Eja akika like ukwaka is ingested by geophagous pregnant women without treatment. A member of the research team accompanied some of the geophagous women who preferentially consumed eja akika to their farms and obtained soil samples from randomly selected termite mounds for analysis.

Examination of soil types

To determine the role of different soil types ingested by pregnant women in the transmission of intestinal nematodes, the concentration of the eggs/larvae in each soil type provided was evaluated using the method of Young et al.21. Briefly, about 20 g of each soil type was preserved in 10% formalin within 24 h of collection. The samples were transported to the Parasitology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, where sample examination was conducted. Entire sample of each soil type was passed through a double layer of 1 mm steel mesh into a petri dish. Water was then added to the dish and examined using an inverted microscope with a mechanical stage and a 10 x objective. Detected eggs/larvae were confirmed and speciated with a 40 x objective. This technique which has proven to have greater/equal sensitivity to the floatation technique usually employed to examine parasites in soil, is based on the protocol for identifying nematodes in stool samples.

Data analysis

The association of geophagy with socio-economic, demographic, obstetrics and soil-transmitted nematodes were evaluated. Out of the 1,047 pregnant women enlisted for the study at baseline, information on geophagy was provided by 797 women at baseline. This group constituted the basis for the cross-sectional analysis. Prevalence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using binomial regression models with a log link function22. Multivariate binomial regression models were used to estimate the adjusted prevalence and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Characteristics of the subjects at baseline

A total of 797 pregnant women out of the 1,047 eligible for the study provided baseline information and stool samples and are included in analysis. The demographic, obstetric and socio-economic characteristics of the study women at baseline are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of the study subjects was 24.8 ± 6 years. Women aged ≤ 20 years constituted 28.6% of the study group while 37.5% were in the 21–30 years age category. Only 7.9% of the participants were aged ≥ 41 years. Most (90.7%) were married with varying occupations including trading (27.5%), small business (25.1%), civil service (23.8%), farming (20.5%), 2.2% were students at enrolment and 0.9% were not employed.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of intestinal nematode-infected pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria, 2012 (n = 797)

Characteristics Responses Frequency Percentage (%)
Age (years) ≤ 20 228 28.6
21–30 299 37.5
31–40 207 26.0
≥ 41 63 7.9
Marital status Single 63 7.9
Married 723 90.7
Occupation Trading 219 27.5
Farming 163 20.5
Civil service 190 23.8
Small business 200 25.1
Schooling 18 2.2
Unemployed 7 0.9
Education(years) Primary 1–6 672 84.3
Secondary 1–6 106 13.3
No formal education 19 2.4
Religion Christianity 771 96.7
Moslem 0 0
Traditionalist 0 0
Other religions 26 3.3
Gestational age First trimester 80 10.0
Second trimester 278 34.9
Third trimester 437 55.1
Parity Primigravidae 327 41.0
Secundigravidae 120 15.1
Multigravidae 350 43.9
Geophagy Yes 370 46.4
No 427 53.6

Intestinal nematodes Ascaris lumbricoides 416 52.2
Hookworm 352 44.4
Trichuris trichiura 17 2.1
Strongyloides 10 1.3
stercoralis

Majority (84.3%) of the subjects had completed 6 years of primary education; 13.3% had acquired secondary school education and 2.4% had no formal education. Christianity was the religion of choice for most (96.7%) of the participants. More than half (55.1%) of the women were in the third trimester of their pregnancy, 34.9% in the second trimester while 10.0% were in the first trimester on enrolment. A substantial proportion (43.9%) of the participants were multiparous, 41.0% were experiencing their first pregnancy, 15.1% had two previous pregnancies. On geophagy, less than half (46.4%) of the study population reportedly consumed earth during gestation period. Species of intestinal nematode parasites were detected, to varying degrees from all the participants: A. lumbricoides (52.2%), hookworm (44.4%) T. trichiura (2.1%), and S. stercoralis (1.3%). There was no statistically significant prevalence difference in the intestinal nematode infection between geophagous and non-geophagous women at baseline (46.4% vs. 53.6%) respectively (Table 1).

Geophagy and the correlates

At baseline, the prevalence of geophagy among the study population was 46.4%. On examination of the correlates of geophagy with socio-economic and intestinal nematode factors using univariate model (Table 2), the age of the pregnant women and their educational status had no significant impact on the prevalence of geophagy. Married pregnant women were more likely to procure and consume earth/soil than the unmarried woman. Also participants who were engaged in farming, small business or who were employed in civil service were more prone to geophagy than those in school or the unemployed. Other socio-demographic factors associated with geophagy included increasing gestational age at enrolment and having had two or more prior pregnancies compared with primipara. Infection with the intestinal nematode A. lumbricoides was strongly correlated with geophagous behaviour (unadjusted-prevalence ratio = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62–2.14; P = 003). Similarly, hookworm infection was significantly associated with geophagy, (unadjusted-prevalence ratio = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.65–1.25; P = 0.049). Other intestinal nematodes detected, T. trichiura, and S. stercoralis did not show any association with geophagy (P-values 0.320, 0.72) respectively.

Table 2.

Univariate associations of geophagy with sociodemographic and intestinal nematode factors among pregnant women in Ebonyi State, Nigeria, 2012 (n = 797).

Variable Frequency Geophagy, n(%) Unadjusted
prevalence ratio
(95% CI)
P value
A. Sociodemographic factors
Age (years)
< 20 228 87(38.2) 1.00
21 – 30 299 197(65.9) 0.95(0.63, 1.18) 0.60
31 – 40 207 65 (31.4) 0.86(0.61, 1.24) 0.32
≥ 41 63 21 (33.3) 0.78(0.54,1.16) 0.28
Gestational age (weeks)
First trimester 80 28(35.0) 1.00
Second trimester 278 126(45.3) 1.58(1.05,2.25) 0.017
Third trimester 439 216(49.2) 1.60 (1.25,2.40) 0.001
Parity
Primigravidae 327 160(48.9) 1.00
Secundigravidae 120 38(31.7) 1.28(1.01, 1.61) 0.026
Multigravidae 350 172 (49.1) 1.10(0.81, 1.50) 0.451
Occupation
Trading 219 97(44.3) 1.00
Farming 163 98(60.1) 0.82(0.62, 0.92) 0.037
Civil service 190 73(38.4) 0.68(0.52,0.83) 0.046
Small business 200 100(50.0) 0.74(0.59, 0.95) 0.024
Schooling 18 0(00.0) 0.93(0.63,1.16) 0.134
Unemployed 7 2(28.6) 0.78(0.53,1.14) 0.201
Marital status
Single 74 23(31.1) 1.00
Married 723 347(48.0) 1.45(1.00,2.09) 0.045
Education
No formal education 19 8(42.1) 1.00
Primary education 672 322(47.9) 1.17(0.70, 1.99) 0.421
Secondary education 106 40(37.7) 0.70(0.42, 1.17) 0.212
B. Intestinal nematode factors
A. lumbricoides infection
Yes 416 234(56.3) 1.22(1.62, 2.14) 0.003
No 381 136(35.7) 1.00
Hookworm infection
Yes 354 127(36.1) 0.98(0.65, 2.60) 0.049
No 443 243(54.9) 1.00
T. trichiura infection
Yes 17 6(35.3) 0.37(0.22, 2.60) 0.320
No 780 364(46.7) 1.00
S. stercoralis infection
Yes 10 3(30.0) 1.10(0.47, 2.51) 0.72
No 787 367(46.6) 1.00

As shown in Table 3, 63.24% of geophagous women were infected with A. lumbricoides, 34.05% with hookworm, 1.62% with T. trichiura, and 1.08% with S. stercoralis. A. lumbricoides infected a significantly higher proportion (63.24%) of geophagous women than non-geophagous (28.57%) (p<0.05). T. trichiura and S. stercoralis infected more non-geophagous than geophagous women. The trend of hookworm infection in both geophagous and non-geophagous women appeared similar (Table 3).

Table 3.

Baseline prevalence of intestinal nematode infection among geophagous and non-geophagous pregnant women in Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Nematode species Number (%)

Geophagousat baseline Non-geophagous at baseline
(N = 370) (N = 427)
Ascaris lumbricoides 234(63.24) 122(28.57)
Hookworm 126(34.05) 120(28.10)
Trichuris trichiura 6(01.62) 47(11.01)
Strongyloides stercoralis 4(01.08) 4(9.37)

Geophagous women were stratified by type of earth/soil consumed: 52.4% (n = 194) of the 370 geophagous subjects preferred eating nzu, 23.5% (n = 87) preferentially consumed eja uno, 10.5% (n = 39) ate eja akika while 13.5% (n = 50) ingested ukwaka. The mean soil daily intake by geophagous pregnant women ranged from eja akika (40.0 ± 6.4 g) to eja uno (56.2 ± 5.7). The type of soil eaten appeared to impact the nematode parasite infection. Analysis of the nzu revealed the presence of Ascaris and Trichuris eggs in eight of the 24 samples. Similarly, 10 of the 15 eja akika contained Ascaris ova and infective larvae of hookworm and S. stercoralis. Six out of 25 eja uno samples had ova of T. trichiura and A. lumbriciodes. A. lumbriciodes eggs were detected in two out of six samples of ukwaka (Table 4).

Table 4.

Parasitology of the soil samples ingested by geophagous pregnant women in Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Local soil types Number Mean Number of Number of Nematode species
geophagous weight(g) of samples samples with
women soil type eaten analysed for nematode
daily nematode eggs/larvae
eggs/larvae
Nzu 194(52.4) 50.2 ± 2.9 24 3 A. lumbricoides(ova)
T. trichiura(ova)
Ejaakika 39(10.5) 40.0 ± 6.4 15 10 A. lumbricoides(ova)
Hookworm (larvae)
S. stercoralis larvae
Ejauno 87(23.5) 56.2 ± 5.7 25 6 A. lumbricoides(ova)
T. trichiura(ova)
Ukwaka 50(13.5) 53.0 ± 3.5 6 2 A. lumbricoides(ova)

Number in parenthesis =percentages

Discussion

The results of our present cross-sectional study showed that 46.4% of pregnant women in Southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria who were in attendance at antenatal clinics deliberately and regularly indulged in the habit of soil/earth consumption. The geophagous prevalence recorded is similar to others reported elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa10,11,13. The results further revealed that although geophagy has been widely regarded as an obligatory response to a physiologic demand during pregnancy9, the behaviour is accepted culturally and perceived as a symbol of reproduction and fertility in the study area. However, many participating pregnant women reportedly engaged in geophagy because of either the flavour or taste of the earth/soil while most (92.3%) ascribed the behaviour as inductive and physiological resulting from their pregnancy. After characterization of socio-demographic correlates of geophagy, marital status and occupation appear to be associated with this soil-eating behaviour. Married pregnant women in the study area ingested earth partly to indicate their own fertility and that of their husbands. In the culturally conservative traditional society of the study area, single but pregnant women tended to suppress their pregnancy largely due to local taboos on pre-marital pregnancies. This could account for the significantly higher prevalence (p<0.05) of geophagy observed among the married pregnant participants over the single but pregnant women.

The observed increase in geophagy prevalence, with increasing gestational age recorded in this study is consistent with results of previous studies elsewhere in sub-Saharan tropical communities6,11,23. In the course of the interview, many participants reportedly commenced eating earth early in the first trimester. This induced physiological demand increased with increasing gestational age perhaps as a consequence of increased need for micronutrients for growth of the developing foetus as well as erythropoiesis. The practice of geophagy has been thought to help supplement mineral nutrients and have detoxifying effects24. The study also showed that the age of the pregnant woman and the educational standard attained were not associated with the prevalence of geophagy. This result further corroborates the findings of earlier studies that showed no association between age or socio-economic status with the prevalence of geophagous behaviour among pregnant women21,23,25. A. lumbricoides and hookworm infections were both significantly associated with geophagy, but no association was established between geophagy and T. trichiura or S. stercoralis. In consonant with results of previous studies13,23 our present data, found that geophagy was associated with A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and hookworm infections among pregnant women. Association of A. lumbricoides with geophagy was also recorded among school children in Kenya, Guinea and South Africa6,9,26. However, no association with A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, hookworm or S. stercoralis infection were recorded in other cross-sectional studies8,21.

The positive association of A. lumbricoides and geophagy is possibly causal because infection by the parasite is mainly by orally ingesting materials contaminated with infective eggs. This investigation also showed that the soil types consumed by the pregnant participants were, in order of preference, nzu 52.5%, eja uno 23.5%, ukwaka 13.5% and eja akika 10.5%. In all soil types, the sucking action of the material was carried out by the women without further processing of the soil. This action further enhanced the transmission potential of each soil with regard to the orally transmitted geo-helminths, especially Ascaris and Trichuris. The soil type most linked to Ascaris, hookworm and Strongyliodes infection in this study was the eja akika. This finding conforms with the results of other studies9,24 that reported termite mounds as the earth most associated with Ascaris infection. Indiscriminate defecation by children and young adults in the study area creates conditions for contamination of the soil with A. lumbricoides, hookworm eggs/larvae, Trichuris ova and Strongyliodes larvae. Both A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura are principally acquired by ingesting infective eggs in contaminated food, or fingers that have been fecally contaminated. While eggs of A. lumbricoides can remain viable in soil for several years, ova of T. trichiura cannot withstand drying21.

There was a significant difference in the prevalence of A. lumbricoides between geophagous and non-geophagous women. This is in agreement with the report of geophagy among lactating and pregnant women in Boudo District, Western Kenya13, but contradicts the report on geophagy and associated geo-helminth infection among school children from Northern Kwa Zulu-Natab, South Africa9. There were also significant differences in prevalence of infection with T. trichiura between geophagous and non-geophagous women, which corroborated the finding on geophagy as a risk factor for geo-helminth infections among Kenyan school children6. This is also plausible biologically since the mode of transmission is through ingestion of contaminated objects. There was no significant intestinal nematode prevalence difference between geophagous and non-geophagous women. A possible explanation is that these categories of women are apparently equally exposed and thus acquired the infection in the course of their farming activities in the fields.

The results obtained from the parasitological examination of the women at baseline and the soil analyses appear to support geophagous behaviour as a mode of transmission, to a greater extent, of A. lumbricoides, and T. trichiura, and to a lesser extent of hookworm and S. stercoralis. Two-thirds of the soil types analysed contained eggs of gastrointestinal nematodes. This implies that geophagous women in the study area tended to consume soil types contaminated with infective nematode eggs. The findings are in conformity with results in Kenya and Jamaica where soil ingested by children contained helminth ova3,6. Responses from interviews showed that geophagous pregnant women were aware of the health implication but were unaware of the possible link of the habit with intestinal nematode infections. As a consequence many subjects never took precautionary measures in the collection and processing of the soil prior to consumption.

Conclusion and recommendations

This study has shown that geophagy by pregnant women is a common behaviour among pregnant women in southern Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Furthermore, the practice is associated with the risk of A. lumbricoides, hookworm, T. trichiura and S. stercoralis infections among this category of women, as attested to by the detection of the ova of the parasites in both the stool and soil samples. However, more confirmatory studies are required to prospectively examine the causal association between geophagy and intestinal nematodiasis. As soil consumption has been associated substantially with the prevalence of intestinal nematodes among pregnant women in the study area, mass sensitization, mobilization and education on the adverse consequences of the behaviour can play a role in curbing the infection process. In addition, deworming should complement and not replace the more conventional approaches to intestinal nematode prevention such as improvement and provision of sanitary facilities at the community level27.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Department of Zoology and Environmental Biology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, for allowing the research team access to facilities in the department. We also thank the pregnant women who participated in the study, for their cooperation; the midwives and nurses, for assisting in recruiting the subjects; the laboratory and administrative staff of Mater Misericordiae hospital, Afikpo, for their invaluable contributions.

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

References

  • 1.Diamond J, Stermer D. Eat dirt. Discov. 1998;19(2):70–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hunter JM. Geophagy in Africa and the United States: a culture-nutrition hypothesis. Geogr Rev. 1973;63:170–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wong MS, Bundy DA, Golden MH. The rate of ingestion of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura eggs in soil and its relationship to infection in two children's homes in Jamaica. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:89–91. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90172-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abraham PW, Parsons JA. Geophagy in the tropics: a literature review. Geogr J. 1996;162:63–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vermeer DE. Geophagy among the Ewe of Ghana. Ethol. 1971;10:56–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giessler PW, Mwaniki D, Thiong OF, Friis H. Geophagy as a risk factor for geohelminth infections: a longitudinal study among Kenyan school children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998;92:7–11. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(98)90934-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prince RJ, Luoba AI, Adhiambo P, Nguono J, Giessler PW. Geophagy is common among women in Western Kenya. Trans Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1999;93:515–516. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(99)90355-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shinondo CJ, Mwikuma G. Geophagy as a risk factor for helminth infections in pregnant women in Lusaka, Zambia. Med J Zambia. 2005;35(2):48–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saathoff E, Olsen A, Kvalsvig JD, Giessler PW. Geophagy and its association with geo-helminth infection in rural school children from Northern Kwa Zulu-Natab South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:485–490. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90413-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thomson J. Anaemia in pregnant women in Eastern Caprivi, Namibia. SAMJ. 1997;87:1544–1547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Giessler PW, Prince RJ, Levene M, Poda C, Beckerleg SE, Mutemi W, Shulman CE. Perceptions of soil eating and anaemia among pregnant women on the Kenyan coast. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48:1069–1079. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00409-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Antelman G, Msamanga GI, Spiegelman D, Wrassa EJ, Narh R, Hunter D, Fawzi WW. Nutritional factors and infections disease contribute to anaemia among pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus in Tanzania. J Nutri. 2000;130:1750–1757. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.8.1950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Louba AI, Geissler PW, Estambale B, Ouma JH, Magnussen P, Alusala D, Ayah R, Mwaniki D, Friis H. Geophagy among pregnant and lactating women in Boudo District, Western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:734–741. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wiley AS, Katz SH. Geophagy in pregnancy, a test of a hypothesis. Curr Anthropol. 1998;39:532–545. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Key TC, Horger EO, Miller JM. Geophagia as a cause of maternal death. Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;60:525–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rothenberg SJ, Manalo M, Jiang J, Khan F, Cuellar R, Reyes S, Sanchez M, Reynoso B, Aguilar A, Diaz M, Acosta S, Jauregui M, Johnson C. Maternal blood lead level during pregnancy in south central Los Angeles. Arch Environ Health. 1999;54:151–157. doi: 10.1080/00039899909602253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Halsted JA. Geophagia in man: its nature and nutritional effects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1968;21:1384–1393. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/21.12.1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.NPC, author. Details of the breakdown of the national and state provisional population totals of 2005 census. National Population Commission (NPC), Abuja, Nigeria. Fed Gov Nigeria Off Gazette. 2007;94(24):8175–8198. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ofomata GEK, Phil-Eze CN. Geographical perspective on environmental problems and management in Nigeria. Jamoe Enterprises, Enugu, Nigeria. 2001 [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ivoke N. Parasitological Techniques. In: Inyang NM, Nwosu MO, Ivoke N, editors. Manual of Laboratory Techniques in Biology. Nsukka, Nigeria: University of Nigeria Press Limited; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Young SL, Goodman D, Farag TH, Ali SM, Khatib MR, Khalfan SS, Tielsch JM, Stoltzfus RJ. Association of geophagia with Ascaris, Trichuris and hookworm transmission in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(8):766–772. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Easu SAS. Calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:199–200. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kawai K, Saathoff E, Antelman G, Msamanga G, Fawzi WW. Geophagy (soil-eating) in relation to anaemia and helminth infection among HIV-Infected pregnant women inTanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(1):36–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.John T, Duquette M. Detoxification and mineral supplementation as functions of geophagy. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;53:448–456. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/53.2.448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Louba AI, Geissler PW, Estambale B, Ouma JH, Alusala D, Ayah R, Mwaniki D, Magnussen P, Friis H. Earth eating and re-infection with intestinal helminthes among pregnant and lactating women in western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2005;10:220–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Glickman LT, Camara AO, Glickman NW, McCabe GP. Nematode intestinal parasites of children in rural Guinea, Africa: prevalence and relationship to geophagia. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:169–174. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Savioli L, Bundy D, Tomkins A. Intestinal parasitic infections: a soluble public health problem. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992;8 doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from African Health Sciences are provided here courtesy of Makerere University Medical School

RESOURCES