Table 3. Cox regression analysis for PFS and OS for advanced-stage ENKTL patients treated with PEMD (N=32).
| Characteristic |
PFS |
OS |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Univariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis |
Univariate analysis |
Multivariate analysis |
|||||
| HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | HR (95% CI) | P | |
| Male | 2.30 (0.52–10.01) | 0.27 | — | — | 1.93 (0.43–8.63) | 0.39 | — | — |
| Nasal subtype | 1.45 (0.50–4.20) | 0.49 | — | — | 1.67 (0.56–4.99) | 0.36 | — | — |
| Age >60 years | 2.15 (0.77–5.96) | 0.14 | — | — | 2.67 (0.92–7.80) | 0.07 | — | — |
| LDH >ULN | 3.40 (1.17–9.88) | 0.02 | 2.01 (0.60–6.74) | 0.26 | 3.66 (1.13–11.75) | 0.03 | 1.80 (0.51–6.36) | 0.36 |
| ECOG score ⩾2 | 0.59 (0.17–2.07) | 0.41 | — | — | 0.81 (0.22–2.92) | 0.74 | — | — |
| Distant lymph-node involvement | 1.11 (0.37–3.32) | 0.85 | — | — | 0.81 (0.27–2.49) | 0.72 | — | — |
| IPI score ⩾3 | 3.67 (1.17–11.47) | 0.03 | 1.77 (0.48–6.54) | 0.39 | 7.84 (1.73–35.49) | <0.01 | 5.02 (0.95–26.5) | 0.06 |
| PINK ⩾2 | 4.03 (1.46–11.08) | 0.02 | 5.60 (1.46–21.54) | 0.01 | 3.46 (1.21–9.88) | 0.04 | 4.56 (1.12–18.50) | 0.03 |
| B-symptoms | 1.74 (0.49–6.13) | 0.39 | — | — | 2.33 (0.52–10.43) | 0.27 | — | — |
| EBV-DNA-positivity | 3.32 (1.11–9.93) | 0.02 | 5.19 (1.73–15.52) | <0.01 | 3.88 (1.26–11.95) | 0.01 | 6.97 (2.05–23.62) | <0.01 |
| Extranodal site >1 | 1.58 (0.59–4.25) | 0.37 | — | — | 2.28 (0.76–6.83) | 0.14 | — | — |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ENKTL, extra-nodal natural-killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma; HR, hazard ratio; IPI, International Prognostic Index; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PEMD, pegaspargase, etoposide, methotrexate and dexamethasone; PFS, progression-free survival; PINK, prognostic index of natural killer lymphoma; ULN, upper limit of normal. Bold signifies P<0.05.