Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;19(1):2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01247.x

Table 3.

Sensitivity and Specificity of the Rules Among 314 Patients With GCS 15 Relative to the Three Outcome Measures

CCHR NOC


Result of Assessment Injury No Injury Injury No Injury
A. Any TBI Evident on CT
 Positive (per rule) 22 186 22 262
 Negative (per rule) 0 106 0 30
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 100 (82–100) 100 (82–100)
 Specificity, % (95% CI) 36.3 (31–42) 10.2 (7–14)
 Potential CT rate 66.2% 90.4%
B. Clinically Important Brain Injury
 Positive (per rule) 11 197 11 273
 Negative (per rule) 0 106 0 30
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 100 (68–100) 100 (68–100)
 Specificity, % (95% CI) 35.0 (30–41) 9.9 (7–14)
 Potential CT rate 66.2% 90.4%
C. Neurosurgical Intervention
 Positive (per rule) 3 60 3 291
 Negative (per rule) 0 251 0 30
 Sensitivity, % (95% CI) 100 (31–100) 100 (31–100)
 Specificity, % (95% CI) 80.7 (76–85) 9.6 (7–14)
 Potential CT rate 20.1% 90.4%

CCHR = Canadian CT Head Rule; NOC = New Orleans Criteria; TBI = traumatic brain injury.