Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017 Mar 22;112:170–185. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.03.002

Table 3.

Pleural Effusion Case Study: Posterior quantities for the model chosen by DIC-τg procedure. Notation: P = P[βg,k > 0|Data], HR (CI) = posterior hazard ratio and 95% credible interval. g = 1, 2, 3 correspond to the three hazard functions and k = 1,, p index to the covariates.

Variable h1: Effusion h2: Death w/o Effusion h3: Death after Effusion

HR (CI) P HR (CI) P HR (CI) P
Asthma
Diabetes 1.18 (1.03–1.33) .99
Stage 3–4 1.13 (1.00–1.29) .97 1.19 (1.03–1.37) .99
Location 2 .86 (.74–1.01) .03 1.18 (.98–1.41) .96
Location 3 .87 (.73–1.04) .06 1.18 (.99–1.42) .97
Age 1.18 (1.04–1.36) .99
Smoker
BMI .90 (.78–1.02) .05 .88 (.76–1.00) .03
Induction Chemo
Good KPS .80 (.71–.91) < .01
Adeno Histology 1.21 (1.02–1.42) .99
Propensity Score .97 (.86–1.12) .34 .92 (.81–1.05) .10 .98 (.88–1.11) .40
IMRT .84 (.74–.96) < .01 .85 (.75–.97) < .01 .98 (.85–1.13) .40