Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Stat Data Anal. 2017 Mar 22;112:170–185. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2017.03.002

Table 4.

Pericardial Effusion Case Study: Posterior quantities for the model chosen by DIC-τg procedure. Notation: P = P[βg,k > 0|Data], HR (CI) = posterior hazard ratio and 95% credible interval. g = 1, 2, 3 correspond to the three hazard functions and k = 1,, p index to the covariates.

Variable h1: Effusion h2: Death w/o Effusion h3: Death after Effusion

HR (CI) P HR (CI) P HR (CI) P
Asthma
Diabetes .91 (.75–1.09) .15 1.14 (1.03–1.27) > .99 1.11 (.90–1.36) .83
Stage 3–4 1.30 (1.17–1.45) > .99
Location 2 1.16 (.95–1.42) .93
Location 3 1.20 (.94–1.54) .92 1.10 (.92–1.33) .85
Age .85 (.72–1.06) .03
Smoker .89 (.74–.106) .09
BMI .91 (.76–1.09) .16 .85 (.76–.95) < .01
Induction Chemo
Good KPS .83 (.75–.92) < .01
Adeno Histology .83 (.68–1.03) .04 1.21 (1.08–1.37) > .99
Propensity Score 1.07 (.89–1.30) .75 .96 (.87–1.08) .25 1.00 (.87–1.17) .51
IMRT .73 (.62–.87) < .01 .80 (.72–.89) < .01 1.08 (.90–1.30) .81