Table 4.

Subset breakdown CFA results

Ecomomic volatility variables
Goodness‐of‐fit statistics	Income loss quintiles					Lost job
	1	2	3	4	5	Yes	No
Obs	5,407	5,372	5,269	5,297	5,392	2,597	23,247
χ2	2,665	2,618	2,854	2,444	2,926	8,109	4,284
SRMR	0.030	0.029	0.031	0.029	0.030	0.030	0.027
RMSEA	0.065	0.064	0.068	0.062	0.068	0.066	0.061
CFI	0.95	0.96	0.95	0.96	0.95	0.96	0.96
TLI	0.94	0.95	0.94	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.95

Personal poverty outcome variables
Goodness‐of‐fit statistics	Crowding			Poverty (2010)
	Low	Medium	High	Yes	No
Obs	23,458	2,981	286	4,658	22,079
χ2	10,440	1,888	391	2,334	10,089
SRMR	0.028	0.033	0.049	0.030	0.029
RMSEA	0.062	0.073	0.083	0.065	0.063
CFI	0.96	0.95	0.92	0.96	0.96
TLI	0.95	0.94	0.90	0.95	0.95

Exposure variables
Goodness‐of‐fit statistics	Peak ground acceleration tercilea			Damage
	Low	Medium	High	Low	Medium	High
Obs	5,624	5,205	5,257	23,641	2,200	896
χ2	2,509	2,758	2,639	10,303	1,329	792
SRMR	0.028	0.033	0.033	0.029	0.032	0.038
RMSEA	0.061	0.067	0.065	0.062	0.070	0.077
CFI	0.96	0.95	0.96	0.96	0.95	0.94
TLI	0.95	0.94	0.95	0.95	0.94	0.93

^aOnly 16,086 of overall 27,737‐person sample had entries for peak ground acceleration.