Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 2;5(10):2325967117729659. doi: 10.1177/2325967117729659

TABLE 1.

Demographic Data and Preoperative Outcome Scores for Study Cohortsa

Variable Patients Aged 20-30 Years (n = 52) Patients Aged 50-75 Years (n = 33) P
Age, yb 24.9 57.7 <.001
Sex, n .074
 Male 33 14
 Female 19 19
Body mass indexb 25.0 24.4 .591
Timing of surgery, n .653
 Acute 30 21
 Chronic 22 12
Follow-up time, yb 3.4 (2-5.6) 3.1 (2-5.8) .250
Chondral defect, n (%) .340c
 Grade 1 48 (84) 20 (53)
 Grade 2 2 (4) 6 (18)
 Grade 3 6 (10) 6 (18)
 Grade 4 1 (2) 4 (11)
Meniscus treatment, n .093d
 Meniscal repair 30 16
 Partial meniscectomy 12 15
Subsequent arthrofibrosis surgery, n (%) 7 (13) 4 (12) .99
Concomitant ligament reconstruction, n
  ACL 32 21 .999
  ACL/FCL 14 7 .796
  ACL/MCL 6 5 .741
ACLR graft type, n .120
 BPTB allograft 19 18
 BPTB autograft 33 15
ACLR graft retear, n 0 0 >.999
Preoperative outcome scoreb
  SF-12 PCS 36.1 41.4 .025
  SF-12 MCS 51.1 52.4 .622
  WOMAC total 41.7 42.2 .933
  Lysholm score 45.1 49.6 .468
  IKDC 78.1 77.0 .702
  Tegner activity scale 2.7 2.8 .903

aACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; FCL, fibular collateral ligament; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; MCL, medial collateral ligament; MCS, mental health component summary; PCS, physical component summary; SF-12, Short Form–12; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

bReported as mean values.

cRepresents the P value for the comparison between the numbers of Outerbridge 3-4 lesions in both cohorts.

dRepresents the P value for the comparison between the rate of meniscal repair versus meniscectomy between the 2 cohorts.