Table 1. TDR engagement in development research for field-based RDT for detection of visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent.
Author Year Country Reference |
Year/Extent of TDR Engagement |
Study Design Subjects Sample Size |
Results | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chappuis 2003 Nepal [30] |
1999–2000 Funding Authorship |
Diagnostic evaluation (rK39 ICT, DAT) study 184 VL patients |
rK39 ICT sens– 97%, spec– 71%; DAT sens– 99%, spec– 82%; |
rK39 ICT compares well with DAT; easy to use in field setting; rK39 ICT can be used for screening test for VL and as a confirmatory test for VL only in high prevalence VL areas due to its high PPV |
Boelaert 2004 Nepal [28] |
2000–2002 Authorship |
Diagnostic (rK39 ICT, FGT, IFAT, DAT) evaluation study 310 VL patients |
rK39 ICT sens– 87.4%, spec– 93.1%; FGT sens– 39.9%; IFAT sens– 28.4%; DAT sens– 95.1% |
DAT, rK39 ICT can replace parasite diagnosis by bone marrow or splenic aspirate as basis for decision to treat VL in national VL elimination programme |
Chappuis 2006 Nepal [31] |
2001–2002 Funding Authorship |
Diagnostic (rK39 ICT, FGT, KAtex) evaluation study 85 VL patients |
rK39 ICT sens– 89%, spec– 90%; FGT sens– 52%; KAtex sens– 57%; Reproducibility higher for rK39 ICT (κ = 0.87) compared to FGT and KAtex; |
rK39 ICT meets most criteria of ASSURED [37] |
Sundar 2007 India [34] |
2005 Funding |
Diagnostic (rK39 ICT, rK26 ICT, DAT-FD, KAtex) evaluation study 282 VL patients |
rK39 ICT sens– 98.9%, spec– 97%; DAT-FD sens– 98.9%, spec– 94%; KAtex sens– 67%;, spec– 99%; rk26 ICT sens– 21.3%, spec– 100%; Reproducibility high (κ>0.94) for all tests; High agreement between rK39 ICT and DAT-FD (κ = 0.986); |
rK39 ICT easy to use in field and preferred RDT for VL elimination programme |
Boelaert 2008 India, Nepal, East Africa [29] |
2003–2006 Funding Authorship |
Diagnostic (rK39 ICT, DAT-FD, KAtex) evaluation study 1,150 VL patients |
rK39 ICT, DAT-FD sens > 96%, spec– 90%; DAT-FD sens– 98%, spec– 91%; KAtex sens– 35–66%;, spec– 87–97%; Reproducibility high (κ > 0.94) for DAT-FD, rK39 ICT |
DAT-FD, rK39 ICT performance variable and lower in East Africa; DAT-FD, rK39 ICT recommended for clinical practice in Indian subcontinent |
Mohapatra 2010 India [26] |
Funding | Diagnostic (rK9, rK26, rK39, CSA, ELISA) evaluation study 55 VL patients |
rK39 sens– 100%, spec– 96% rK9 sens– 78%, spec– 84% rK26 sens– 38%, spec– 80% CSA sens– 80%, spec– 72% |
rK39 most suitable antigen compared to rk9, rk26, CSA; rK9 antigen may be used as adjunct to rK39 for accurate diagnosis of VL or if rK39 antigen not available |
WHO 2011 ISC, East Africa, South America [20] |
2009 Funding Authorship |
Diagnostic (5 commercial RDTs—rK39 ICT, rkE16 ICT) evaluation study 250 VL patients 9 testing laboratories (4 in Indian subcontinent) |
Accuracy of RDTs between centres comparable but significantly different between regions; sens, spec, reproducibility (operator to operator, run to run), heat stability high for all RDTs in Indian subcontinent, variable in East Africa, South America |
In Indian subcontinent, all brands of RDTs performed well; Need to establish minimal performance limits; Results can be used to guide procurement. |
Cunningham 2012 ISC, East Africa, South America[39] |
2009 Funding Authorship |
Diagnostic (five commercial rK39 ICT) evaluation study 550 VL patients |
All rK39 ICTs good sens (92.8–100%) and spec (96–100%) in Indian subcontinent; Lower and variable sens in East Africa and South America; Reproducibility (operator to operator, run to run) high (κ = 0.73–0.99) |
Commercial rK39 ICT kits performed well in Indian subcontinent; Need to assess performance in HIV-compromised VL patients |
Reviews | ||||
Sundar 2002 ISC [24] |
Funding | Review | Parasite diagnosis by splenic or marrow or skin lesion remains gold standard but with limitations; DAT limited by cost, multiple steps, incubation, and antigenic variation; |
rK39 ICT good sens and spec, rapid results, and can be used in field setting; Need R&D for urine-based KAtex and field-adaptable version of PCR. |
Boelaert 2007 [18] |
Authorship | Review of considerations for evaluation of diagnostic tests (test for case detection, cure, relapse, surveillance, drug resistance, certification of elimination) | High performance of rK39 ICT (InBios) in India [32]; lower spec (71%) in Nepal in early prototype; higher spec [30] in later generation of InBios ICT [28] and with DiaMed ICT [40]; | Need to standardize methodology for evaluation of RDTs to prevent substandard or counterfeit products being used in endemic areas. |
Abbreviations: CSA, crude soluble antigen; DAT-FD, direct agglutination test, freeze-dried antigen; FGT, formol gel test; ICT, immunochromatographic card test; IFAT, immunofluorescent antibody test; ISC, Indian subcontinent; KAtex, latex agglutination test for leishmania antigen; R&D, research and development; RDT, rapid diagnostic test; rK9, recombinant kinesin 9; rK26, recombinant kinesin antigen 26; rK39, recombinant kinesin antigen 39; sens, sensitivity; spec, specificity; VL, visceral leishmaniasis.