Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 12;7:13047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13013-y

Table 2.

Mean relative abundances of the 25 MCRA clusters for the four treatment groups.

MCRA Cluster Treatment P-value
R A RA AA
0 0.5a 0.8a 1.0a 0.9a NS
1 56.1a 21.0b 30.7b 28.6b <0.01
2 0.2a 0.3a,b 0.9b,c 0.9c <0.001
3 17.4a 34.7a 23.6a 25.3a NS
4 3.1a 3.2a 3.4a 3.6a NS
6 4.0a 4.0a 8.0a 9.0a NS
10 1.2a 3.9b 2.7a,b 2.9a,b <0.05
11 2.4a 0.5b 2.0a 2.8a <0.01
13 0.1a 0.5a,b 0.8b 1.6b <0.001
14 0.0a 0.6b 0.4b 0.5b <0.001
32 0.0a 0.7b 1.2b 0.8b <0.001
144 0.0a 3.4b 3.8b 4.63b <0.001
883 0.0a 4.1b 3.8b 3.5b <0.001
7083 11.5a 3.6b 4.6b 2.7b <0.001
7084 1.9a 0.3b 0.7b 1a,b <0.01
7087 0.2a 0.1b 0.2a,b 0.2a <0.01
7089 0.3a 0.2a 0.2a 0.4a NS
7092 0.4a 0.1b 0.1b 0.1b <0.001
7094 0.0a 10.0b 7.8b 6.8b <0.001
7105 0.2a 0.2a 0.1a 0.3a NS
7159 0.1a 0.6b 0.5a,b 0.4a,b <0.05
22291 0.3a 2.8b 1.1bc 0.9c <0.001
23687 0.0a 4.1b 2.3b 1.8b <0.01
23941 0.0a 0.1b 0.1b 0.4b <0.01
23942 0.0a 0.2b 0.2b 0.1a,b <0.01

P-values are FDR corrected and derived from Wilcoxon Pairwise comparisons of MCRA clusters between different treatment groups.