Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 21;18(6):888–897. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.6.888

Table 2. Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability.

Items No. of Eligible Articles (Denominator) Yes (%) No or Uncertain (%)
Use of recommended statistical methods
 Analysis of dichotomous/nominal data 5 5 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
 Analysis of ordinal data 15 7 (46.7) 8 (53.3)
 Analysis of continuous data 21 20 (95.2) 1 (4.8)
Reporting of weighting method for weighted kappa 7 2 (28.6) 5 (71.4)
Reporting of model for ICC 17 6 (35.3) 11 (64.7)
Reporting of assumption for ICC 17 5 (29.4) 12 (70.6)
Appropriate use/interpretation of reliability parameters 13 10 (76.9) 3 (23.1)
Correct meaning of reproducibility and repeatability 15 12 (80.0) 3 (20.0)

Data are numbers of articles with proportion of eligible articles for each item described as percentage in parentheses.