Table 2.
Key component | Description | Process measure(s) |
---|---|---|
A time‐limited, 9‐month intervention | The CTI worker should still be in touch with the client and be providing intervention up to the time of the 9‐month postdischarge due date. | Did you receive support services from the shelter organization since the last interview? |
Decreasing intensity of services | CTI involves intensive outreach during Phase 1, then gradually decreases in intensity until Phase 3 when CTI is about monitoring. | How often did you meet your CTI worker/case manager in the past 3 months? |
How often did you talk to your CTI worker/case manager on the phone in the past 3 months? | ||
In vivo (i.e., community‐based) needs assessment and provision of services | Preferably, the CTI worker should not provide shelter‐based standard case management in addition to CTI. | Is your CTI worker/case manager the same person who provided services to you in the shelter? Or is this someone else? (3‐month follow‐up only) |
The CTI worker should visit the client where he/she is living or receiving community services. | Where did you usually meet your CTI worker/case manager? | |
Early establishment of community linkages | The CTI worker should meet at least once a month with the client before discharge. | Did you already meet or talk to your CTI worker/case manager during shelter stay? (3‐month follow‐up only) |
Strengthening of community linkages through negotiation and mediation | The CTI worker should encourage communication between the client and community linkages. | Do you receive help from other professionals or agencies to achieve your goals? |
Maintaining contact with clients with histories of transience, in order to minimize drop‐outs | The CTI worker should have provided at least 7 months of active postdischarge intervention. | How often did you meet your CTI worker/case manager in the past 3 months? |
How often did you talk to your CTI worker/case manager on the phone in the past 3 months? |
Descriptions of the key components were derived from the CTI fidelity scale (Conover & Herman, 2007).