Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;17:186. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2

Table 2.

Roc curve analysis for the ability of different parameters to differentiate between forme fruste keratoconus eye and control eyes

parameter AUC SE 95%CI P value cutoff sensitivity specificity
Ks 0.6 0.092 0.42,0.78 0.353 42.5 64% 50%
Kf 0.5 0.091 0.3,0.6 0.93 NA NA NA
Km 0.82 0.06 0.68,0.95 0.353 42.4 64% 80%
CCT 0.58 0.1 0.38,0.77 0.446 NA NA NA
CT min 0.61 0.6 0.4,0.8 0.3 516 60% 80%
PE 0.45 0.129 0.02,0.07 0.67 NA NA NA
BDE 0.60 0.094 0.41,0.77 0.38 3.5 53% 80%
PPI avg 0.404 0.016 o.19,o.61 0.37 NA NA NA
PPI max 0.64 0.093 0.64,0.83 0.174 1.31 50% 70%
ART avg 0.57 0.10 0.36,0.78 0.486 NA NA NA
ART min 0.56 0.10 0.35,0.77 0.551 NA NA NA
ART max 0.88 0.056 0.77,0.99 < 0.001 404 82% 70%
D index 0.67 0.102 0.47,0.87 0.097 1.2 71% 60%

ART Ambrosio relational thickness, AUC area under curve, avg. average, BDE back difference elevation, CCT central corneal thickness, CI confidence interval, CT min minimum corneal thickness, D index multimetric D, Kf flat keratometry, Km mean keratometry, Ks steep keratometry, max maximum, min minimum, NA not applicable,SE standard error, PE posterior elevation, PPI pachymetric progression index