Table 3.
Characteristics of family medicine practices included in the project.
Explanatory variables | Regression coefficient | Standard Error | Upper and lower 95% confidence Interval | p |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Female | 0.17 | 4.66 | -8.97, 9.30 | 0.972 |
Male | reference | |||
Status | ||||
Self-contractor | 6.47 | 5.22 | -3.76, 16.70 | 0.215 |
Public servant | reference | |||
IT provider | ||||
No. 1 | 19.03 | 8.13 | 3.10, 34.96 | 0.019 |
No. 2 | 12.18 | 19.57 | -26.18, 50.55 | 0.534 |
No. 3 | 8.88 | 6.53 | -3.92, 21.67 | 0.174 |
No. 4 | 21.85 | 7.79 | 6.57, 37.12 | 0.005 |
No. 5 | reference | |||
Area | ||||
Rural | -2.61 | 5.17 | -12.74, 7.52 | 0.614 |
Urban | reference | |||
Specialisation | ||||
General Practice | -2.92 | 6.99 | -16.62, 10.78 | 0.676 |
Family Medicine | -0.46 | 7.00 | -14.17, 13.26 | 0.948 |
No specialisation | reference | |||
Region | ||||
Celje | -8.32 | 11.03 | -29.94, 13.31 | 0.451 |
Koper | -1.99 | 11.92 | -25.36, 21.38 | 0.868 |
Krsko | 11.18 | 14.45 | -17.14, 39.49 | 0.439 |
Kranj | 4.02 | 10.70 | -16.95, 24.99 | 0.707 |
Ljubljana | -4.58 | 9.42 | -23.05, 13.88 | 0.627 |
Maribor | -35.92 | 10.97 | -57.42, -14.42 | 0.001 |
Murska Sobota | -17.34 | 11.32 | -39.52, 4.85 | 0.126 |
Nova Gorica | -0.40 | 11.00 | -21.95, 21.15 | 0.971 |
Novo Mesto | 0.37 | 11.45 | -22.07, 22.80 | 0.975 |
Ravne na Koroskem | Reference | |||
Age (years) | -0.17 | 0.22 | -0.61, 0.26 | 0.435 |
Duration of participation in the project | 1.47 | 0.11 | 1.24, 1.69 | < 0.001 |