Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Apr 18;36(8):1722–1732. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2694887

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison between standard CT reconstruction (e,g) and FSCT reconstruction (c) of the simulated phantom oscillating at 9.924 Hz (a). A transient profile shown through a single row (white dashed line) is provided for the simulated phantom (b) and FSCT reconstructed image (d), resolving periodic motion over multiple 9.924 Hz oscillation cycles. A static profile through the same row is provided for the standard reconstructed images (f,h).