Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;117(11):2281–2293. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3715-9

Table 2.

Mean training data during intervention

HIIT (n = 15) CT (n = 15) Interaction effect
1–4 weeks 5–8 weeks 9–12 weeks 1–4 weeks 5–8 weeks 9–12 weeks P Partial η 2
Power output (W) 95 ± 20 105 ± 17 109 ± 18†$ 81 ± 16 94 ± 18 100 ± 20†$ 0.203 0.057
Heart rate (%HRpeak) 81 ± 4 81 ± 5 81 ± 3 78 ± 5 79 ± 5 79 ± 6 0.587 0.019
RPE (0–10 scale) 6.1 ± 1.2 5.8 ± 1.3 5.2 ± 1.2 4.5 ± 1.5* 4.6 ± 1.7* 4.7 ± 1.7 0.003 0.212
Total work done (kJ) 146 ± 25 149 ± 49 153 ± 28 247 ± 46* 278 ± 55* 286 ± 55* 0.031 0.117
Weekly training time commitment ~75 min (~129 min including warm up, rest and cool down) ~150 min (~180 min including warm up and cool down)

Values are expressed as means ± SD

Partial η 2 value for effect sizes

P values for interaction (group × time) effect

CT continuous training group, HIIT high-intensity interval training group, HR peak heart rate peak (includes recovery periods for HIIT group), RPE rating of perceived exertion

*Significantly different from HIIT at same time point (P < 0.01)

Significantly different from 1 to 4 weeks

$Significantly different from 5 to 8 weeks