Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;5(10):e1004–e1016. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30339-X

Table 5.

Intervention effect on LAZ at 18 months by infant sex and multidimensional poverty index quartiles

Control
Intervention
Difference (95% CI)* Interaction p value
n Mean LAZ (SD) n Mean LAZ (SD)
Infant sex
Female 732 −2·04 (1·10) 664 −1·90 (1·09) 0·145 (0·005 to 0·285) 0·33
Male 682 −2·78 (0·97) 692 −2·70 (1·01) 0·065 (−0·075 to 0·204) ··
Multidimensional poverty index quintiles
First (poorest) 190 −2·77 (1·07) 197 −2·74 (1·08) −0·033 (−0·255 to 0·189) 0·082 (categorical); 0·0069 (linear)
Second 292 −2·59 (1·03) 260 −2·53 (1·13) 0·020 (−0·190 to 0·229) ··
Third 440 −2·34 (1·14) 436 −2·27 (1·03) 0·145 (−0·026 to 0·315) ··
Fourth 398 −2·25 (1·09) 390 −2·12 (1·12) 0·207 (0·023 to 0·391) ··
Fifth (richest) 94 −1·96 (1·04) 73 −1·68 (1·18) 0·311 (−0·013 to 0·636) ··

LAZ=length-for-age Z score.

*

Analyses adjusted for district, belonging to a scheduled tribe and scheduled caste, and whether hamlet or village residence (fixed effects) and for village (random effect).