Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 9;5(11):e1123–e1132. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30341-8

Table 3.

Estimated numbers of households (in thousands) incurring tuberculosis-related catastrophic costs in India

Total number of households (95% UR) Number of households (95% UR) per income quintile*
1 2 3 4 5
Harvard model
Base case 20 596 (16 848–24 278) 8785 (8276–9203) 5955 (4334–7394) 4199 (3024–5449) 1332 (920–1874) 326 (197–512)
Improvement in DS-TB care 19 544 (15 976–23 049) 8357 (7864–8766) 5638 (4104–7006) 3979 (2864–5168) 1261 (871–1775) 309 (187–486)
Improvement in MDR-TB care 20 475 (16 753–24 130) 8739 (8232–9155) 5917 (4309–7349) 4171 (3005–5413) 1324 (915–1860) 324 (196–509)
TIME model
Base case 21 926 (18 864–24 629) 6757 (6442–7106) 7101 (6370–7571) 5383 (3854–6685) 2036 (1425–2740) 649 (493–826)
Improvement in DS-TB care 20 547 (17 690–23 079) 6381 (6065–6732) 6635 (5950–7074) 5027 (3602–6243) 1898 (1329–2556) 605 (459–771)
Improvement in MDR-TB care 21 790 (18 742–24 485) 6696 (6378–7049) 7059 (6327–7526) 5360 (3839–6659) 2028 (1419–2731) 647 (491–824)

Catastrophic costs are defined as the sum of costs exceeding 20% of total household income. In the base case, all coverage levels and treatment success rates at the start of the study were assumed to be maintained at a constant for the period 2016–35. UR=uncertainty range. DS-TB=drug-sensitive tuberculosis. MDR-TB=multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. TIME=TB Impact Model and Estimates.

*

From poorest (quintile 1) to richest (quintile 5).