Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug 14;65(10):2265–2271. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15042

Table 1.

Description of participants and of medication reconciliation discrepancies and recommendations provided by TRIM assessment

Variable Intervention N=64 Control N=64
Female, n (%) 1 (1.6) 1 (1.6)
Age, n (%)
 < 70 27 (42.2) 25 (39.1)
 70–79 31 (48.4) 26 (40.6)
 80+ 6 (9.4) 13 (20.3)
Nonwhite, n (%) 17 (26.6) 14 (21.9)
Married, n (%) 30 (46.9) 36 (57.1)
Educational level, n (%)
 High school or less 9 (14.1) 6 (9.4)
 Some college 38 (59.4) 34 (53.1)
 College or more 17 (26.6) 24 (37.5)
Income, n (%)
 Some money left over 17 (26.6) 33 (36.5)
 Just enough 35 (54.7) 32 (50.8)
 Not enough 12 (18.8) 5 (12.7)
Employment status, n (%)
 Full time 5 (7.8) 3 (4.7)
 Part time 11 (17.2) 6 (9.4)
Quality of life best possible or good, n (%) 48 (75.0) 49 (76.6)
Self-rated health, n (%)
 Excellent or very good 21 (32.8) 14 (21.9)
 Good 25 (39.1) 30 (46.9)
 Fair or poor
>5 chronic conditions, n (%) 22 (34.4) 24 (37.5)
Number of medications, mean (SD) 13.4 (5.2) 13.8 (4.8)
Medication reconciliation
 1+ discrepancies, n (%) 63 (98) 31 (97)
 Number of discrepancies, mean (SD) 4.25 (2.4) 5.9 (2.9)
Recommendations
 1+ recommendation(s), n (%) 60 (93) 64 (100)
 1+ potentially inappropriate medications, n (%) 34 (53) 16 (50)
 Overtreatment of DM, n (%) 28 (44) 11 (34)
 Overtreatment of HTN, n (%) 49 (77) 26 (81)
 Incorrect dosing for renal function, n (%) 11 (17) 5 (16)
 Low adherence and/or cognitive impairment, n (%) 20 (31) 15 (47)