Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug 14;65(10):2265–2271. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15042

Table 3.

Association of intervention with patient-centered care and communication, adjusted for covariatesa and accounting for clustering of patients by clinician

Outcome Odds ratiob 95% Confidence Interval P-value
PACIC >10 2.73 0.82, 9.08 0.1018
1+ clinician recommendation(s) 3.33 1.37, 8.04 0.0076
Intervention parameterc Standard error P-value
Patient active participation 2.89 0.78 0.0003
Patient medication communication 3.68 0.92 0.0001
Clinician facilitative communication 0.89 0.30 0.0036
Clinician medication communication 2.45 1.11 0.0288
Association of intervention with communication, controlling for communication of other member of the clinician-patient dyad
Outcome Intervention parameterc Standard error P-value
Patient active participation 1.48 0.65 0.0257
Patient medication communication 2.58 0.79 0.0014
Clinician facilitative communication 0.22 0.26 0.3872
Clinician medication communication 0.01 1.01 0.9923
a

All models included the covariates of age, marital status, income, education, employment, self-rated health, and count of chronic conditions. Models examining patient active participation, also included quality of life, and models examining patient and clinician medication communication included quality of life and race/ethnicity.

b

Obtained from GEE models

c

Obtained from mixed models