Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 9;130(11):2231–2247. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2956-7

Table 1.

CDpop (expected reliability) computed with the λ estimated by REML for AD (Dent NAM families). The size of the families are indicated between brackets

Predicted family
B73 (64) D06 (99) D09 (100) EC169 (66) F252 (96) F618 (104) Mo17 (53) UH250 (94) UH304 (81) W117 (84) Average
Calibration family B73 (64) . 0.30 0.27 0.42 0.27 0.30 0.29 0.31 0.25 0.28 0.30
D06 (99) 0.41 . 0.67 0.48 0.40 0.42 0.38 0.66 0.39 0.39 0.47
D09 (100) 0.40 0.71 . 0.42 0.42 0.41 0.39 0.62 0.45 0.39 0.47
EC169 (66) 0.39 0.33 0.27 . 0.25 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.24 0.26 0.29
F252 (96) 0.37 0.40 0.39 0.36 . 0.35 0.38 0.41 0.39 0.37 0.38
F618 (104) 0.41 0.41 0.38 0.41 0.35 . 0.36 0.42 0.36 0.37 0.39
Mo17 (53) 0.33 0.32 0.30 0.34 0.31 0.30 . 0.35 0.27 0.33 0.32
UH250 (94) 0.42 0.66 0.58 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.41 . 0.37 0.38 0.46
UH304 (81) 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.30 0.33 0.32 0.29 0.32 . 0.30 0.31
W117 (84) 0.37 0.37 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.36 0.38 0.37 0.34 . 0.36
Average 0.38 0.43 0.40 0.39 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.37