Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 10;8:718. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00718

Table 1.

Clinical trials investigating the efficacy and safety/tolerability of sunitinib against different cancer types.

Tumor type Clinical status Therapeutic combination ClinicalTrials.gov identifier Notes
Relapsed or refractory esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00702884 Sunitinib was well tolerated but only a subset of treated patients benefited [10 out of 25 (42%) had stable disease > 10 weeks] (Wu et al., 2015).
Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Phase II Sunitinib as a maintenance therapy following induction platinum + etoposide based therapy NCT00616109 Sunitinib did not maintain disease stability following response to chemotherapy (only 4/16 [25%] patients had stable disease). Sunitinib was discontinued due to disease progression (50%), toxicity (31%), and patient request (19%) (Schneider et al., 2011).
Metastatic breast cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NA Sunitinib was modestly active in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer (11% partial response and 5% stable disease). Most adverse effects were mild-to-moderate and managed with supportive treatment and/or dose modification (Burstein et al., 2008).
Refractory or relapsed small cell lung cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00620347 Partial tumor response was reported in 2 out of 23 patients, The median progression free survival was short and sunitinib was not tolerated in most patients did not tolerate sunitinib (Han et al., 2013).
Relapsed or refractory germ cell tumor (resistant to standard platinum-based chemotherapy) Phase II Monotherapy NCT00453310 Sunitinib was well tolerated, but at standard doses, did not demonstrate significant activity in highly refractory germ cell tumor (no objective responses were found and all patients developed progressive disease within three cycles of sunitinib) (Feldman et al., 2010).
Local or metastatic papillary and non-clear cell renal cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00459875 Out of 22 evaluated patients, only one partial response was observed in unclassified metastatic renal cell carcinoma patient. No objective responses were found in patients with papillary metastatic renal cell carcinoma and non-clear cell histologies (Molina et al., 2013).
Non-clear cell renal cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00465179 Out of 55 analyzed enrolled patients, three had partial response, 29 and 23 had stable and progressive diseases respectively.
Cytokine refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00077974 Sunitinib demonstrated efficacy and manageable adverse-event profile as a monotherapy in second-line therapy for patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic clear-cell RCC (Motzer et al., 2006).
Progressive metastatic transitional cell cancer of the urothelium. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00397488 3 out of 71 patients had partial response. 29/71 (40.9%) had stable disease. Almost 55% (39/71) progressed.
Advanced prostate cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00299741 Sunitinib was well tolerated with modest benefit (Michaelson et al., 2009).
Metastatic colorectal cancer. Phase II In combination with capecitabine NCT00961571 This study was terminated due to unanticipated side effects and futility.
Brain metastases caused by kidney cancer or melanoma. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00462982 Out of the five patients who completed the study, three had stable disease and two progressed.
Imatinib resistant metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberan. Prior to sunitinib, patients could undertake other chemotherapy, radiotherapy and local surgery. NA Out of 30 imatinib-resistant patients, two had complete response (6.7%), 10 had partial response (33.3%), 12 had stable disease (40%) and 6 porgressed (20%). The progression free survival of complete response and partial response patients were 22 months and 20 months respectively. Hence, sunitinib therapy conferred good clinical efficacy and tolerated adverse effects as a new in imatinib resistant dermatofibrosarcoma protubern (Fu et al., 2015).
Metastatic mucosal or acral melanoma. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00577382 Sunitinib was active against mucosal and acral melanoma that was independent of KIT mutation. Nevertheless, it was poorly tolerated, and with no prolonged responses (Buchbinder et al., 2015).
Recurrent, refractory, or progressive malignant glioma or ependymoma. Phase II Monotherapy NCT01462695 Sunitinib was well tolerated in children and young adults with recurrent high- grade glioma or ependymoma. Sunitinib therapy significantly modulated plasma VEGFR2. Nevertheless, there were no sustained antitumor responses (Wetmore et al., 2016).
Metastatic, locally advanced, or locally recurrent sarcomas (non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcoma). Phase II Monotherapy NCT00474994 One patient achieved a confirmed partial response. 10 patients (20%) achieved stable disease for at least 16 weeks. There were no unexpected toxicities observed (George et al., 2009).
Metastatic pancreatic cancer. Phase II Monotherapy -maintenance therapy NCT00967603 Results have not published yet.
Recurrent or inoperable meningiomas. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00589784 Out of 35 analyzed patients with aggressive meningiomas, one had complete response, one had partial response, 25 had stable disease and eight progressed. The four patients with WHO grade I meningioma and hemangioblastoma treated with sunitinib progressed.
Advanced gastric cancer. Phase II Together with docetaxel NCT01238055 Results have not published yet.
Inoperable liver cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00699374 Continuous daily sunitinib treatment (37.5 mg) was feasible and had moderate activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Koeberle et al., 2010).
Myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00451048 10 patients completed the study, but no statistical analysis is provided for the overall response Rate (complete response, partial response, or hematologic improvement).
Persistent or recurrent clear cell ovarian cancer. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00979992 Out of 30 analyzed patients, the % of objective tumor response rate (complete and partial response) is 6.7.
Advanced urothelial carcinoma. Phase II Monotherapy NCT00393796 Maintenance sunitinib did not appear to improve the 6-month progression rate. Open-label sunitinib had only modest activity (Grivas et al., 2014).

NA: Not available.