Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2017 Mar 29;60(7):3052–3069. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00112

Table 2:

Comparison of MLM stability between paroxetine and GSK180736A analogs

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0037.jpg
R = Name Scaffold t1/2 in MLM
(min)

N/A 2 N/A 1.91

H 3 B 20.6

H Paroxetine A 24.3

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0038.jpg 14ah A 36.4
15 B 3.37

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0039.jpg 14ag A 45.9
16 B 3.46

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0040.jpg 14ai A 24.9
4 B 3.82

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0041.jpg 14ak A 3.15
17 B 11.32

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0042.jpg 14as A 7.0

graphic file with name nihms-908163-t0043.jpg 14au A 10.3