Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 14;11(4):304–308. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5415

Table 2.

Rate of major congenital malformations (MCM) compared in singleton assisted reproductive technology (ART) and singleton normal conception (NC) infants


Variable MCM OR (95% CI)(Crude) P value(Crude) OR (95% CI)(Adjusted)* P value(Adjusted)
No Yes

Reproductive technology 0.059 0.047
Normal 623 (95.6%) 29 (4.4%) Reference Reference
ART 154 (91.7%) 14 (8.3%) 1.89 (0.98-3.66) 1.89 (1.01-3.66)
Sex 0.87 0.79
Boy 397 (95%) 21 (5%) Reference Reference
Girl 380 (94.5%) 22 (5.5%) 1.09 (0.59-2.02) 1.08 (0.58-2.01)
Maternal age (Years) 0.56 0.73
<35 622 (95 %) 33 (5%) Reference Reference
>35 155 (93.9%) 10 (6.1%) 1.22 (0.59-2.52) 1.14 (0.54-2.37)
History of stillbirth 0.48 0.74
No 766 (94.8%) 42 (5.2%) Reference Reference
>1 11 (91.7%) 1 (8.3%) 1.96 (0.21-13.15) 1.41 (0.17-11.38)
History of abortion 0.129 0.65
No 540 (95.6%) 25 (4.4%) Reference Reference
>1 237 (92.9%) 18 (7.1%) 1.64 (0.88-3.06) 1.21 (0.53-2.76)
Delivery 0.25 0.34
Normal 107 (97.3%) 3 (2.7%) Reference Reference
Cesarean 670 (94.4%) 40 (5.6%) 2.13 (0.65-7.01) 1.80 (0.53-6.04)

*; Adjusted for all variables in Table 1. OR; Odds ratio and CI; Confidence interval.