Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cochlear Implants Int. 2017 Aug 10;18(6):324–334. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2017.1359457

Table IV.

Individual performance for each subject on CUNY Sentences (dB SNR re: 50% SRT), TIMIT Sentences (% correct) and Vowel recognition in quiet (% correct) for the 8 and 20 channel conditions. The difference between performance using the 8 and 20 channel maps (“Change”) is also shown.

CUNY Sentences (dB SNR) TIMIT Sentences (%) Vowels in quiet (%)
8-channel 20-channel Change 8-channel 20-channel Change 8-channel 20-channel Change
S60R 6.85 3.42 +3.17 59.24 69.18 −9.94 68.75 75.00 −6.25
S60L 6.03 3.75 +2.29 56.75 64.68 −7.93 81.25 79.68 +1.57
S85 11.16 7.92 −3.24 53.29 60.09 −6.80 69.27 75.52 −6.25
S86 10.78 12.02 −1.24 46.31 53.15 −6.84 70.31 69.27 +1.04
S98 10.06 7.92 +2.14 51.71 68.18 −16.46 77.18 73.43 +3.74
S99 10.50 4.71 +5.79 43.60 56.91 −13.30 46.88 76.04 −29.16
S100 12.64 7.98 +4.66 40.36 48.99 −8.63 63.54 80.73 −17.19
S103 9.38 5.95 +3.43 35.04 49.81 −14.77 52.65 47.91 +4.73
AVG 9.67 6.70 +2.12 48.28 58.87 10.58 66.22 72.19 5.97
SD 2.21 2.85 2.99 8.38 7.96 3.76 11.61 10.43 11.8

Note that a decrement in performance as the number of channels was decreased from 20 to 8 is indicated with negative (−) change for TIMIT and Vowel stimuli but a positive (+) change for CUNY sentences. Average (AVG) and standard deviations (SD) for the group of subjects are provided for each condition, for each speech test.