Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Haematol. 2015 Dec 2;172(4):535–544. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13855

Table IV.

Comparison of patients who did receive HDT/SCT to those who did not

Variable No HDT/SCT
N=18
N (%)
Received HDT/SCT
N=15
N (%)
p-value
Median age, years (range) 68 (34–83) 59 (27–69) 0.03
Age at diagnosis 0.06
 ≤60 years 5 (28) 9 (60)
 >60 years 13 (72) 6 (40)
Sex 0.48
 Female 4 (22) 5 (33)
 Male 14 (78) 10 (67)
Karnofsky performance score 0.79
 70 3 (17) 2 (13)
 80–100 15 (83) 13 (87)
Diagnosis 0.64
 PTCL-NOS 10 (56) 11 (73)
 AITL, 5 (28) 3 (20)
 ALCL, T- and null cell types 3 (17) 1 (7)
Ann Arbor Stage 0.84
 II 2 (11) 2 (13)
 III – IV 16 (89) 13 (87)
B symptoms 0.57
 No 9 (50) 9 (60)
 Yes 9 (50) 6 (40)
IPI Score 0.65
 Low 4 (22) 5 (33)
 Low – intermediate 4 (22) 5 (33)
 High – intermediate 6 (33) 3 (20)
 High 4 (22) 2 (13)
Lactate dehydrogenase 0.85
 Normal 9 (50) 8 (53)
 Elevated 9 (50) 7 (47)
Extranodal involvement 0.39
 0–1 12 (67) 12 (80)
 2 or more 6 (33) 3 (20)
Median number of chemotherapy cycles (range) 2 (1–6) 4 (1–6) 0.03

HDT/SCT, high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation, PTCL, peripheral T-cell lymphoma; AITL, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; IPI, International Prognostic Index.