Table 3.

Predicted changes in SDQ scores for participants with high SDQ scores at baseline after fish, meat or supplement intervention, different models.

		Crude SDQ scores			SDQ scores adjusted for:
					Baseline score		Baseline score & compliance
SDQ scales	n	Baseline Mean (SD)	12 weeks Mean (SD)	p-withina	Change Mean (95% CI)	p-valueb	Change Mean (95% CI)	p-valuec
Emotional problems (≥ 5)
Fish	26	6.4 ± 1.3	6.0 ± 1.9	0.25	−0.31 (-0.92,0.30)	-	−0.21 (-0.89,0.47)	-
Meat	31	5.8 ± 1.1	4.7 ± 1.5	<0.01	−1.20 (-1.75,-0.64)	0.04	−1.20 (-1.76,-0.63)	0.03
Supplement	29	6.1 ± 1.4	5.2 ± 1.9	<0.01	−0.82 (-1.39,-0.25)	0.23	−0.91 (-0.89,0.47)	0.17
Conduct problems (≥ 4)
Fish	13	4.5 ± 1.1	2.9 ± 1.9	<0.01	−1.64 (-2.39,-0.89)	-	−1,38 (-2,23,-0,48)	-
Meat	19	5.1 ± 1.4	3.5 ± 1.5	<0.01	−1.53 (-2.16,-0.91)	0.83	−1,56 (-2,19,-0.93)	0.75
Supplement	17	4.5 ± 0.6	3.5 ± 1.5	<0.01	−0.98 (-1.63,-0.32)	0.18	−1,14 (-1,87,-0.41)	0.71
Hyperactivity/inattention (≥ 6)
Fish	33	7.2 ± 1.3	6.2 ± 1.5	<0.01	−0.90 (-1.44,-0.37)	-	−0.88 (-1.50,-0.26)	-
Meat	31	7.1 ± 1.1	6.6 ± 1.4	0.07	−0.44 (-0.99,0.11)	0.23	−0.44 (-1.00,0.12)	0.28
Supplement	29	6.8 ± 1.0	5.6 ± 2.1	<0.01	−1.32 (-1.89,-0.75)	0.29	−1.35 (-2,0,-0.66)	0.37
Peer problems(≥ 4)
Fish	15	4.3 ± 0.5	2.9 ± 1.1	<0.01	−1.47 (-2.28,-0.65)	-	−1.26 (-2.15,-0.38)	-
Meat	18	4.8 ± 1.2	3.1 ± 1.9	<0.01	−1.95 (-2.70,-1.20)	0.78	−1.95 (-2.69,-1.22)	0.72
Supplement	11	5.0 ± 1.0	3.6 ± 1.2	0.03	−1.31 (-2.23,-0.39)	0.32	−1.26 (-2.15,-0.38)	0.20
Prosocial behaviour (≤ 5)
Fish	20	4.6 ± 1.0	5.6 ± 1.4	<0.01	0.84 (0.15,1.52)	-	0.88 (0.15,1.61)	-
Meat	19	4.4 ± 1.2	5.5 ± 1.9	0.02	1.05 (0.35,1.75)	0.63	1.06 (0.35,1.77)	0.69
Supplement	21	4.7 ± 0.6	5.5 ± 1.3	0.02	0.76 (1.0, 1.42)	0.86	0.7 (-0.02,1.45)	0.75
Total difficulties (≥15)
Fish	25	17.8 ± 2.9	16.4 ± 3.9	0.02	−1.54 (-3.01,0–08)	-	−1.88 (-3.60,-0.15)	-
Meat	26	18.6 ± 3.5	14.3 ± 3.6	<0.01	−4.11 (-5.55,-2.67)	0.02	−4.10 (-5.54,-2.65)	0.06
Supplement	20	18.0 ± 2.6	15.3 ± 4.7	<0.01	−2.78 (-4.42,-1.14)	0.27	−2.38 (-4.34,-0.42)	0.73