Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Sep 26;13(10):5131–5145. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00464

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(a) The RMSDs of the models that would have been picked for all Rosetta rounds using the score-only method and the consensus score method for soluble proteins (blue) and membrane protein refinement utilizing 4 Å (red) and 6.9 Å (green) density maps. (b) Histogram of occurrences that a model with lower or same RMSD was picked by the consensus score method compared to the score-only method. For soluble proteins, 4 Å membrane refinement and 6.9 Å membrane refinement the model picked was better or the same 100%, 73% and 87% of the cases respectively.