Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 25;114(41):10864–10869. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706233114

Table 1.

Experimental protocol loading parameters

Conditions Results
Trials Rate (mm s−1) Load (N) Participant Material A0 (mm2) A (mm2) λ (s) tmax (s) AE (t=60s)
a1 1.0 2.0 A Glass 3.7 ± 0.2 39.5 ± 0.2 16.5 ± 0.3 2.2 0.39
a2 1.0 2.0 A Glass 20.9 ± 0.6 38.4 ± 0.2 5.5 ± 0.4 2.8 0.35
b1 1.0 3.0 A Glass 19.5 ± 0.5 35.5 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 0.2 2.2 0.37
b2 1.0 3.0 A Glass 29.5 2.4 0.39
c1 2.0 2.0 A Glass 4.0 ± 0.9 29.3 ± 1.9 27.0 ± 3.1 1.2 0.30
c2 2.0 2.0 A Glass 4.3 ± 0.2 30.9 ± 0.2 11.2 ± 0.3 1.0 0.31
d1 0.5 2.0 B Glass 0.7 3.4 0.01
d2 0.5 2.0 B Glass 1.9 3.3 0.09
e1 1.0 2.0 B Glass 7.4 ± 0.4 26.7 ± 0.4 16.2 ± 1.1 1.4 0.27
e2 1.0 2.0 B Glass 15.0 ± 0.6 38.6 ± 0.5 15.6 ± 1.3 1.7 0.37
f1 1.0 3.0 B Glass 2.6 1.7 0.17
f2 1.0 3.0 B Glass 9.3 ± 0.4 29.1 ± 0.4 16.0 ± 0.1 1.8 0.25
g 2.0 2.0 B Glass 8.0 ± 0.7 28.2 ± 0.3 9.5 ± 0.8 0.8 0.28
h 1.0 2.0 B PDMS 25.0 ± 0.1 25.0 ± 0.1 <0.04 2.4 0.38

Subscripts in trial labels indicate repeated conditions. Results show the values of the best fit parameters to first-order kinetics Eq. 1. Missing values indicate the absence of a good fit.