Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;2016(10):CD002142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002142.pub4

GETCB 05CB88.

Methods 1988 to 1994
RCT
Participants 539 patients
 Stages I, II, III
Trial data used in subgroup analyses for sex, age, stage and nodal status
Interventions Surgery + radiotherapy vs surgery alone
 RT details
 60 Gy in 24 to 30 fractions in 6 weeks
 Prescription technique: isocentre
 Machine used: Co60 and linac (majority linac)
 Average field size (cm): unavailable
 Clinical target volume: bronchial stump, hilum, mediastinum
 Technique: spinal cord blocks, oblique fields, lateral fields
Outcomes Survival
Notes Same publication as GETCB 04CB86
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "randomly assigned by centralised telephone procedure"
Comment: stated as randomised in paper; checks run on IPD suggest adequate sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Comment: randomisation by central telephone call
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: trial not blinded owing to the nature of the intervention; outcome not likely influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes
Other bias Low risk Comment: study apparently free of other sources of bias