Lille 1985.
Methods | 1985 to 1991 RCT |
|
Participants | 163 patients
Stage I Trial data used in subgroup analyses for sex, age, histology, stage and nodal status |
|
Interventions | Surgery + radiotherapy vs surgery alone RT details 45 to 60 Gy in 22.5 to 30 fractions in 6 weeks Prescription technique: isodose 90% Machine used: Co60 and linac Average field size (cm): 12 × 12 Clinical target volume: hilum, upper mediastinum Technique: spinal cord blocks, oblique fields, lateral fields | |
Outcomes | Survival | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised with a table of randomisation according to Snedecor and Cochran" Comment: stated as randomised in paper; checks run on IPD suggest adequate sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "randomised with a table of randomisation according to Snedecor and Cochran"; insufficient information provided |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: trial not blinded owing to the nature of the intervention; outcome not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | Comment: study apparently free of other sources of bias |