Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 11;2016(10):CD002142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002142.pub4

MRC LU11.

Methods 1986 to 1993
RCT
Participants 308 patients
 Stages II, III
Trial data used in subgroup analyses for sex, age, histology, stage and nodal status
Interventions Surgery + radiotherapy vs surgery alone
 RT details
 40 Gy in 15 fractions in 3 weeks
 Prescription technique: central axis, at midplane
 Machine used: Co60 and linac
 Average field size (cm): unavailable
 Clinical target volume: hilum, mediastinum, supraclavicular fossae for upper lobes
 Technique: spinal cord blocks, oblique fields, lateral fields
Outcomes Survival
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Comment: stated as randomised in paper; checks run on IPD suggest adequate sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "treatment assigned by central office"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: trial not blinded owing to the nature of the intervention; outcome not likely influenced by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: individual participant data obtained and checked for all outcomes
Other bias Low risk Comment: study apparently free of other sources of bias