Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Fluid Mech. 2017 Jul 21;825:600–630. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.338

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(Colour online) Ezbc formulation: density plots of the magnitude of the (a) Lagrangian velocity and (b) Eulerian velocity for a device with dimensions comparable to the acoustic wavelength. The bottom wall is actuated. These results are to be contrasted with those in figure 4. The Ezbc formulation (results in this figure) yields results that we believe are erroneous. The lines represent the streamlines of the respective velocities. Here the Lagrangian velocity streamlines cross the channel walls, indicating an unphysical mass flow across the channel walls. By contrast, consistent with the boundary conditions imposed in Ezbc formulation, here the Eulerian velocity streamlines do not cross the channel. These results are not supported by experimental evidence reported in Barnkob et al. (2016).